Take some time out, and enjoy a bit of history and insights into the occult which exposes the very depths of the fallen angels and their workings.
So, we have had oil prices so low lately that in America we can buy gas for less than $3.00 a gallon for the first time in years! I recall when G. Bush left office in ’08 that gas sold for about $1.98 / ga.. Then after the election the price soared across the country to close to $4.00 /ga.. They would bob up and down between $3.20 – $3.75 and an occasional spike to $4.00 over the next 6 years. Then, just before the mid-term elections this year we saw them fall below $3.00/ga! You could practically hear the hallelujah chorus singing in the streets.
I said back in ’09 that the oil companies were going to get us used to paying well over $3.00/ga so they could milk us for all our money. People forgot what $1.98 / ga felt like, and now anything close to $3.00 / ga seems like mercy. The real question is why has the price changed recently? Was it political? I mean we see little games around election time, but in this case I am thinking it’s not quite the game being played. It’s politics on the world stage. Anyone who remembers the oil embargoes and lines at the gas stations in ’70’s must recall what stopped this problem. It was the fact that America actually started to move forward with new oil fields and was talking about building more refineries that caused OPEC to lower the prices finally to stop us from competing with them. They lowered the price of oil (sweet crude) so much that we simply could not pump ours out of the ground and be profitable at such prices, and it’s happening again folks.
With N. Dakota fields pumping millions upon millions of sweet crude out of the ground daily, OPEC has been forced to lower their prices and pump more of their oil. It’s simple supply and demand. Hardinvestorassets.com has the interview with Phil Flynn a senior energy analyst and a futures account exec. at Chicago based – Price Futures Group. I picked up the interview at ETF.com.
HardAssetsInvestor: What’s the biggest reason oil prices have dropped so dramatically in recent weeks?
Phil Flynn: If I only have to give you one reason, it would be the rise of U.S. oil production. It’s really changed the world. We also have a slowing global economy, and Saudi Arabia is raising oil production, along with other OPEC members. They wouldn’t be doing that if they weren’t concerned about losing market share to non-OPEC producers such as the United States and Russia.
We’re in this dynamic because the U.S. oil producers are shaking up the Saudis a little bit. And in return, the Saudis are trying to send the U.S. oil producers a message by producing more oil. It’s a combination of those factors that’s driving prices down.
HAI: Do you think that these lower prices are going to derail the U.S. oil boom?
Flynn: That’s what the Saudis hope. But I don’t think we’re there yet. A lot of people say the marginal cost for U.S. production is $80/barrel. Yet even at $80, we’re above breakeven for most producers. I’ve seen estimates that suggest many producers can produce profitably at $30. It really depends on the people you talk to.
Overall, the ability of the U.S. oil producer to withstand a sell-off in price is a lot stronger than it would have been, say, in the 1980s, when the Saudis broke the back of the Texas producers. That said, we’re probably getting close to the point where the producers are going to start feeling the pain.
HAI: Are there any similarities to the natural gas market? There we saw prices crater, yet production continued to rise.
Flynn: There are some similarities. But one of the reasons natural gas production continues to rise is because producers can make money selling other liquids such as oil. But that dynamic might change if oil prices continue to plummet. But your general point is right: These shale producers have confounded the experts time and time again.
People have underestimated the shale producers and they’re likely overestimating the breakeven price of U.S. shale. It would be a risky play for the Saudis to try to sink the U.S. oil producers. Or maybe the Saudis are just trying to get other producers like Russia to consider cutting back production. Whatever is behind it, it definitely is raising the concerns that we could see a major price collapse in this market.
So, what has caused the lower prices in gas? More production has done this. What has caused more production in gas? America is pumping oil out of the ground. America has a LOT of oil. What does the American economy need to rebound? We are screaming for jobs! Where are Walmart cashiers making $20/hr? They are making record hourly wages in N. Dakota because everyone wants to work the oil fields and make $100,000.00/yr with little or no experience which drives up wages for non-oil jobs! Thus, if America were to start pumping oil from Alaska, Dakotas, Gulf of Mexico we would see a massive job boom and economic recovery and gasoline around $1.00/gallon once again! What would we do with all this money? We would pay taxes and rebuild our infrastructure which would mean MORE JOBS! How hard is this to understand folks? Lastly, ask yourself why the Middle East is so important. What does it matter who our friends are? How would your energy bill doubling or tripling affect your bottom line each month?
Domestically, it can be found in many different states and could potentially produce between 1.2-1.8 trillion barrels of oil in the future. To put these numbers into context; America consumed an estimate of 7 billion barrels of oil in 2011 according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The Royal Dutch Shell have viewed the extreme amounts of shale oil in America as an opportunity to expand and multiple their production in future years. SOURCE
Here is a summary of what Putin said at the recent Sochi conference. Basically, Russia is done playing the games of the elites. The United States is not going to be allowed to throw it’s weight around, and it’s time to put the toys up and talk like adults or prepare for world war III. I am noticing that yet again, Putin is sounding like the adult/ man of the people and I do not trust him. This is propaganda as well, and must be kept in mind when reading these comments by Putin:
This was taken from JewNews, and you can read Putin’s speech there.
(For your convenience, I am pasting in the full transcript of his speech below.) Western media did their best to ignore it or to twist its meaning. Regardless of what you think or don’t think of Putin (like the sun and the moon, he does not exist for you to cultivate an opinion) this is probably the most important political speech since Churchill’s “Iron Curtain”speech of March 5, 1946.
In this speech, Putin abruptly changed the rules of the game. Previously, the game of international politics was played as follows: politicians made public pronouncements, for the sake of maintaining a pleasant fiction of national sovereignty, but they were strictly for show and had nothing to do with the substance of international politics; in the meantime, they engaged in secret back-room negotiations, in which the actual deals were hammered out. Previously, Putin tried to play this game, expecting only that Russia be treated as an equal. But these hopes have been dashed, and at this conference he declared the game to be over, explicitly violating Western taboo by speaking directly to the people over the heads of elite clans and political leaders.
The Russian blogger chipstone summarized the most salient points from Putin speech as follows:
1. Russia will no longer play games and engage in back-room negotiations over trifles. But Russia is prepared for serious conversations and agreements, if these are conducive to collective security, are based on fairness and take into account the interests of each side.
- All systems of global collective security now lie in ruins. There are no longer any international security guarantees at all. And the entity that destroyed them has a name: The United States of America.
The builders of the New World Order have failed, having built a sand castle. Whether or not a new world order of any sort is to be built is not just Russia’s decision, but it is a decision that will not be made without Russia.
Russia favors a conservative approach to introducing innovations into the social order, but is not opposed to investigating and discussing such innovations, to see if introducing any of them might be justified.
Russia has no intention of going fishing in the murky waters created by America’s ever-expanding “empire of chaos,” and has no interest in building a new empire of her own (this is unnecessary; Russia’s challenges lie in developing her already vast territory). Neither is Russia willing to act as a savior of the world, as she had in the past.
Russia will not attempt to reformat the world in her own image, but neither will she allow anyone to reformat her in their image. Russia will not close herself off from the world, but anyone who tries to close her off from the world will be sure to reap a whirlwind.
Russia does not wish for the chaos to spread, does not want war, and has no intention of starting one. However, today Russia sees the outbreak of global war as almost inevitable, is prepared for it, and is continuing to prepare for it. Russia does not war—nor does she fear it.
Russia does not intend to take an active role in thwarting those who are still attempting to construct their New World Order—until their efforts start to impinge on Russia’s key interests. Russia would prefer to stand by and watch them give themselves as many lumps as their poor heads can take. But those who manage to drag Russia into this process, through disregard for her interests, will be taught the true meaning of pain.
In her external, and, even more so, internal politics, Russia’s power will rely not on the elites and their back-room dealing, but on the will of the people.
To these nine points I would like to add a tenth:
- There is still a chance to construct a new world order that will avoid a world war. This new world order must of necessity include the United States—but can only do so on the same terms as everyone else: subject to international law and international agreements; refraining from all unilateral action; in full respect of the sovereignty of other nations.
To sum it all up: play-time is over. Children, put away your toys. Now is the time for the adults to make decisions. Russia is ready for this; is the world?
Which Putin is real?
I could not bring you better news than to say that the Mexican court has released Marine Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi on grounds of his ptsd. Thank you God for his release, and now I ask that we pray for him, his family, and all who were negatively affected by this wrongful imprisonment. I pray that Mr. Tahmooressi gets the help he needs and despite whatever he has gone through in Mexico that his wounds both spiritual and physical will be healed in Yeshua’s name.
Mexico orders immediate release of Marine veteran
SAN DIEGO (AP) — A Mexican judge ordered the immediate release of a jailed U.S. Marine veteran who spent eight months behind bars for crossing the border with loaded guns.
The judge on Friday called for retired Marine Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi (Tah-mor-EE-si) to be freed because of his mental state and did not make a determination on the illegal arms charges against the Afghanistan veteran diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, according to a Mexican official who had knowledge of the ruling but was not authorized to give his name.
Tahmooressi has said he took a wrong turn on a California freeway that funneled him into a Tijuana port of entry with no way to turn back. His detention brought calls for his freedom from U.S. politicians, veterans groups and social media campaigns.
“It is with an overwhelming and humbling feeling of relief that we confirm that Andrew was released today after spending 214 days in Mexican Jail,” the family said in a statement.
I said it days ago that this Ebola situation is a psy-op. Now we have this nurse who is refusing to cooperate with being quarantined and challenging the legality of it. So now, they will push this into the legal arena and make it perfectly legal to force anyone deemed a risk to be put under lock-down. This is not ordinary nurse folks. They scrubbed the net of her linked-in data, and now we find out she was specially trained to be an intelligence officer for the CDC in the same way military intelligence people are trained.
Naturally, one has to ask why is this happening? Do they want to just keep our borders open? Do they want America to be in a pandemic situation and weak? Why? Do they want to disrupt the 2014 elections? Is this a prelude to Martial law? How would other countries view America if we have Ebola running rampant? Would Americans not be locked out of them now? Is this the new war? Out goes the war on drugs, terrorism, poverty and in comes the era of the war on pandemics / Ebola! Imagine the money to be made and no healthcare system but a single payer government controlled one! Seems like a win win for the power mongers.
Here is the article:
Thursday, October 30, 2014
by Mike Adams
(NaturalNews) Nurse Kaci Hickox, who has made headlines over the last few days by refusing to quarantine herself after returning from the Ebola front lines in Africa, turns out to have been trained as an “intelligence officer” under a two-year CDC program modeled after the U.S. military.
As you can see from the document below, Hickox graduated from a two-year CDC intelligence officer training program in 2012. This is the same nurse whose LinkedIn page was recently scrubbed to hide her ties to the CDC, an agency that stands to benefit tremendously in both political power and budgets if an Ebola outbreak sweeps across America.
The official intelligence designation granted to Nurse Hickox by the CDC was “Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer,” and she is a graduate of the 2012 EIS program according to this CDC document (PDF). (See page 138 – 139 for her name and photo, or view photo below.)
That same year, the CDC graduated 81 such “intelligence officers” whose names and photos are also listed in the public document.
The CDC models its operations after the U.S. military
What is a CDC intelligence officer? To understand the answer, you first have to realize that the CDC models itself after the U.S. military which is why CDC “officers” wear military costumes when appearing before Congress, complete with shoulder stripes, stars and badges.
Just as with the U.S. Army, the CDC also has “intelligence officers” whose jobs include gathering intelligence, analyzing intelligence and conducting counterintelligence ops. The CDC’s sanitized description of this job is found on this web page which states:
EIS officers are on the public health frontlines, conducting epidemiologic investigations, research, and public health surveillance both nationally and internationally.
That same page shows a photograph of a CDC intelligence officer wearing a military costume, complete with multiple stars on the shirt collar and a military-style name tag. These are symbols used to project the appearance of authority by adopting military dress even though the CDC isn’t even under the command of the Dept. of Defense.
The uniforms are just one sign of the militarization of the CDC, an organization so steeped in delusional theatrics that it still won’t admit sneeze particles can travel farther than 3 feet or that Ebola actually has a 42-day incubation period, not the 21 days we are repeatedly told.
Serving the public, or endangering it?
With all this said, why is a CDC-trained intelligence officer screaming so loudly about putting herself into a home quarantine for 21 days to reduce the risk of transmitting Ebola to other Americans? If the CDC is supposed to be serving the public, then why is this CDC-trained intelligence officer clearly abandoning any real concern for public safety by refusing to comply with a sensible self-quarantine rule?
“I don’t plan on sticking to the guidelines,” she said in a Today interview.  “I remain appalled by these home quarantine policies that have been forced upon me… I’m not going to sit around and be bullied around by politicians and be forced to stay in my home when I am not a risk to the American public.”
These are not the words of a concerned, ethically-driven epidemiologist. They are the words of a CDC intelligence operative who has been trained in the art of information warfare. Her words reflect the aims of the CDC which has openly opposed all sensible pandemic protections for Americans.
America’s most important medical decisions, in other words, are right now being influenced by an intelligence operative trained by the CDC under a two-year program modeled after the military.
Are her actions and words now starting to make a lot more sense?
I found the site by scientists who are dissenting from Darwinism. This is their “About” page. I think it’s high time American children learned the truth about this wacky theory NOT being accepted by many scientists. It’s a religion based on faith because quite frankly you cannot prove it, you cannot observe it, and it’s never been seen to happen! Species to not change into other species.
A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism
During recent decades, new scientific evidence from many scientific disciplines such as cosmology, physics, biology, “artificial intelligence” research, and others have caused scientists to begin questioning Darwinism’s central tenet of natural selection and studying the evidence supporting it in greater detail.
Yet public TV programs, educational policy statements, and science textbooks have asserted that Darwin’s theory of evolution fully explains the complexity of living things. The public has been assured that all known evidence supports Darwinism and that virtually every scientist in the world believes the theory to be true.
The scientists on this list dispute the first claim and stand as living testimony in contradiction to the second. Since Discovery Institute launched this list in 2001, hundreds of scientists have courageously stepped forward to sign their names.
The list is growing and includes scientists from the US National Academy of Sciences, Russian, Hungarian and Czech National Academies, as well as from universities such as Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT, UC Berkeley, UCLA, and others.
A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism
“We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”
“There is scientific dissent from Darwinism. It deserves to be heard.”
HOUSTON – A prominent chemist who was recognized this year as one of the 50 most influential scientists in the world says most scientists do not understand how evolution could explain the existence of life.
Dr. James Tour is a well-known professor at Rice University, specializing in chemistry, nanoengineering, and computer science. Over the last 30 years, Tour has authored over 500 research publications, and he was recognized as one of “The 50 Most Influential Scientists in the World Today” by TheBestSchools.org. Tour has also received awards and recognitions from the American Chemical Society, Thomson Reuters, Honda, NASA, and others.
In a video released in late 2012, Tour explained that he has had extensive experience studying the origin of life.
“I will tell you as a scientist and a synthetic chemist,” Tour said, “if anybody should be able to understand evolution, it is me, because I make molecules for a living, and I don’t just buy a kit, and mix this and mix this, and get that. I mean, ab initio, I make molecules. I understand how hard it is to make molecules.”
Despite his experiences and expertise, Tour admits that he does not understand how evolution could account for life’s existence.
“I don’t understand evolution, and I will confess that to you,” he says in the video. “Is it okay for me to say, ‘I don’t understand this’? Is that all right? I know that there’s a lot of people out there that don’t understand anything about organic synthesis, but they understand evolution. I understand a lot about making molecules; I don’t understand evolution. And you would just say that, wow, I must be really unusual.”
However, Tour says he is not the only one who does not understand how life could have arisen through natural, unguided processes.
“Let me tell you what goes on in the back rooms of science—with National Academy members, with Nobel Prize winners,” Tour stated. “I have sat with them, and when I get them alone, not in public—because it’s a scary thing, if you say what I just said—I say, ‘Do you understand all of this, where all of this came from, and how this happens?’”
The answer he inevitably receives, Tour explained, is: “no.”
“Every time that I have sat with people who are synthetic chemists, who understand this, they go, ‘Uh-uh. Nope.’” Tour said. “And if they’re afraid to say ‘yes,’ they say nothing. They just stare at me, because they can’t sincerely do it.”
Fair says there is an important distinction between microevolution and macroevolution—the former is clearly observable and repeatable, but the latter has never been witnessed.
“From what I can see, microevolution is a fact; we see it all around us regarding small changes within a species, and biologists demonstrate this procedure in their labs on a daily basis. Hence, there is no argument regarding microevolution,” he wrote in a blog post. “The core of the debate for me, therefore, is the extrapolation of microevolution to macroevolution.”
After recognizing that evolutionists are “collectively bewildered” by life’s origins, Tour joined nearly 900 other scientists in signing A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism, which states: “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”
If evolution cannot account for life’s existence, then how did life originate? Tour says the most reasonable answer is simple.
“I believe fundamentally that God created us all,” he told the Houston Chronicle.
Now, if that headline does not make you stop and take notice then nothing will! Being forewarned is to be fore armed. Imagine an ebola infected person with mild symptoms gets off a plane in New York. They walk down the street sneezing and coughing. They go into a restaurant, buffet, or movie theatre. They have active germs on their hands, and touch the arm or underside of the table. They touch the guard rail going upstairs to an establishment. It’s 40 degrees outside, and Ebola germs are living there for 50 days! Every man, woman or child who touches that surface has been exposed to Ebola and is walking around for 3 weeks without a clue they have been infected, and we have people complaining about being put in quarantine to see if they are ill!
This is why America needs to shut off all ports of entry from hot zones. All passengers need to be categorized, their names shared with states so if they show up flying into your state or entering your ER room, you have a heads up! The government is forcing this illness on Americans and they will force quarantine on us. Had they been serious about keeping it out then they would have done just as the other African countries had done and shut our borders to the hot zone countries and safety quarantined our doctors/ nurse / support staff who are coming home. Oddly, in the old days they did this themselves in Africa before heading home. Something is up folks, and it’s time to wake up. Colloidal silver /nano silver particularly has been shown to kill Ebola.
This study shows some very alarming facts for you to arm yourself and do what’s smart for you and your family:
Ebola can survive on surfaces for almost TWO MONTHS: Tests reveal certain strains survive for weeks when stored at low temperatures
- Research claims certain strains of Ebola can remain on surfaces for 50 days
- It survived the longest on glass surfaces stored at 4° (39°F)
- Centres for Disease Control and Prevention claims Ebola typically lives on a ‘dry’ surface for hours – including doorknobs and tables
- But when stored in moist conditions such in mucus, this is extended
- Survival time depends on the surface, and the room temperature
- Virus can be killed using household bleach and people must come into direct contact with the sample to risk infection
For their 2010 paper, ‘The survival of filoviruses in liquids, on solid substrates and in a dynamic aerosol’, Sophie Smither and her colleagues tested two particular filoviruses on a variety of surfaces.
These were the Lake Victoria marburgvirus (Marv), and Zebov.
Each was placed into guinea pig tissue samples and tested for their ability to survive in different liquids, and on different surfaces at different temperatures, over a 50-day period.
When stored at 4° (39°F), by day 26, viruses from three of the samples were successfully extracted; Zebov on the glass sample, and Marv on both glass and plastic.
By day 50, the only sample from which the virus could be recovered was the Zebov from tissue on glass.
‘This study has demonstrated that ﬁloviruses are able to survive and remain infectious, for extended periods when suspended within liquid and dried onto surfaces,’ explained the researchers.
‘Data from this study extend the knowledge on the survival of filoviruses under different conditions and provide a basis with which to inform risk assessments and manage exposure.’
The researchers do stress that these tests were carried out in a controlled lab environment, and not in the real world, but published their findings to highlight the survival rates.
Last week the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated its Ebola guidelines following the rise in infections.
I enjoy G. Edward Griffin’s work, and this documentary covers fifty years of his research and ties together that has happened in our world and why the middle class is struggling economically. The description of this documentary states:
In this exclusive 80 minute video interview, legendary conspiracy author G. Edward Griffin explains how his research, which spans no less than 5 decades, has revealed a banking elite obsessed with enforcing a world government under a collectivist model that will crush individualism and eventually institute martial law as a response to the inevitable backlash that will be generated as a result of a fundamental re-shaping of society.
Griffin discusses the similarities between the extreme left and the extreme right in the false political paradigm and how this highlights a recurring theme – collectivism. Collectivism is the opposite of individualism and believes that the interests of the individual must be sacrificed for the greater good of the greater number, explains Griffin, uniting the doctrines of communism and fascism. Both the Republican and Democrat parties in the United States are committed to advancing collectivism and this is why the same policies are followed no matter who is voted in to the White House.
“All collectivist systems eventually deteriorate into a police state because that’s the only way you can hold it together,” warns Griffin.
Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University Professor and mentor to former president Bill Clinton, explained in his books Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment, how the elite maintained a silent dictatorship while fooling people into thinking they had political freedom, by creating squabbles between the two parties in terms of slogans and leadership, while all the time controlling both from the top down and pursuing the same agenda. Griffin documents how the Tea Party, after its beginnings as a grass roots movement, was later hijacked by the Republicans through the likes of Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck.
Pointing out how Republicans and Democrats agree on the most important topics, such as US foreign policy, endless wars in the Middle East, and the dominance of the private banking system over the economy, Griffin lays out how the left-right hoax is used to steer the destiny of America.
Griffin also talks at length on a myriad of other important subjects, such as the move towards a Chinese-style censored Internet, the demonization of the John Birch Society as a racist extremist group, the Hegelian dialectic, the power of tax-exempt foundations and the Council on Foreign Relations, the movement towards world government, and the question of whether the elite are really worried about the growing awareness of their agenda amongst Americans.
I have been watching the news regarding Ebola for a while now as have most people. I have watched Obama taken what appears to be illogical steps to NOT protect Americans by closing off America to those coming from Ebola infected countries and / or quarantining said individuals for a time to make sure they are not infected. He and his administration seem to be more worried about the economic impact to African countries and claim it will actually make the problem worse to keep it from spreading.
We have the race baiting sorts saying it’s because the victims are black that we in the West do not care. We hear that because white Americans survived their infections and a black African came here and died that it was because he was black and without insurance! The emotions of people are running high as we watch Ebola coverage 24/7 waiting for the latest news all while other news items seem to have been forgotten. Anyone remember the IRS, Benghazi, Fast and Furious scandals? Well, as I sit here pondering what is happening the thought came to me that if we do not stop this spread of Ebola soon then it won’t be stopped. The CDC has said we have 60 days to stop it or it’s over and it will be across the world! Obama has the perfect alibi to not being a forceful power grabbing dictator.
He sat back in the early days and kept borders open, flights coming in, and did not want to appear heavy handed. So, when the crisis reaches a fever pitch and it appears it will, then when he institutes the executive orders he has already signed, he can say, “I had no choice in this military quarantine and rounding up of people!” Obama will say that out of concern for our safety he put aside his desire for freedom and agreed that our security had to be protected! He can declare martial law, open up the FEMA camps, force vaccinate Americans, and hold anyone indefinitely while they run tests on them and say he is a reluctant dictator.
My friends, we are watching political poetry in motion. Hitler did not want to become a totalitarian dictator. It was not until the Reichstag fire that things got into full swing, and now we know that was a false flag event perpetrated by the German government (NAZI part) to turn the people in favor of following the NAZI plans. We now hear stories about this nurse who is complaining about her treatment and she is very connected to the CDC. In the past, doctors self quarantined IN Africa before returning to the States, and yet somehow now they just come back here and act as if it’s ok to take the subway, fly on planes, and risk the health of Americans? I cannot help but wonder if we are not watching a pandemic false flag that will be the final step toward worldwide government led by Obama.