The Fake President : Obama is a LIE

I am posting this video at the top and bottom because I think it’s that important.  Ignore it at your own peril:


The issue of Obama’s past has not gotten much press lately.  The major media has done an excellent job of painting anyone who brings up Obama’s birth certificate as a tin hat wearing nut job and labelled them “Birthers”.  I can still hear the derisive tone and voice inflection when that word is used.  Yet, what are the inconsistencies regarding our President.  He has no right to sit in the highest office of the land. In fact, he could not legally produce enough verifiable information to be a trash collector if he tried to get a job as that.  Why?  His Birth Certificate is FAKE, and thus how did he ever get a drivers license?  His SSN is FAKE!   He never signed up for Selective Service either, and here is the proof:

Behind All The Scandals Is A Lie So Big That It Could Utterly Destroy Obama

“In the age of Obama, we have witnessed the complete metamorphosis of the media…”

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see – Ayn Rand

Many Americans believe that the US Government, the Democrat and Republican Parties, and the media are deliberately misleading the American people, hiding the most heinous fraud and Constitutional crisis in the history of the United States.

Individuals at the highest levels of the federal government may have aided and abetted a deception, which included willful ignorance, misinformation, false interpretations of the Constitution, outright lies, and the creation of fraudulent documents and computer records to protect an ineligible, ill-prepared ,and unworthy candidate for the office of President of the United States.

In the age of Obama, we have witnessed the complete metamorphosis of the media, no longer objective journalists but partisan liberal activists who control, manipulate, and even create news to support a left-wing political agenda.

On April 27, 2011, Barack Obama presented as his official birth certificate a digital image so riddled with anomalies that only counterfeiters or the complicit could vouch for its authenticity.

Evidence has been reported claiming that Barack Obama has been using a fraudulent Connecticut Social Security Number (SSN) since at least 1986. That number, 042-68-4425, issued in 1977, was set aside exclusively for Connecticut residents, a state in which he never lived nor did any member of his immediate family. In addition, SSN Verifier Plus showed the birth year 1890 linked to that number. Because SSNs are not re-issued, multiple birth dates for one card suggest a stolen number.

The data and documents associated with Obama’s Selective Service registration also contain inconsistencies. Most noticeably, Obama’s registration card has a two digit year ‘80″ on the postal stamp, unlike the four digit year stamp “1980″ found on all other registration cards completed at the same time in Hawaii and other states. It appears that a 2008 postal stamp was cut, the 08 inverted and reinserted into the stamp to mimic a 1980 registration. Interestingly, Obama’s SSN 042-68-4425 appears on his 1980 Selective Service registration, which is six years before that number can be found in personal background databases.

I believe that Barack Obama did not register with the Selective Service in 1980 because he was attending Occidental College with a foreign student status and in 1981 traveled to Pakistan using an Indonesian passport. According to the law, failure to register with the Selective Service would forever prevent Obama from working in the executive branch of the US government.

One could readily conclude that Obama lied and flouted the law to get elected. It should come as no surprise then, that he would lie and flout the law to implement his policies.

I believe Obama succeeded in 2008 because the Republicans struck a deal with the Democrats not to question Obama’s eligibility for office and his personal history. Furthermore, the liberal media took radical steps to protect their favored candidate, killing negative stories about Obama and even threatening to accuse his opponents of racism in order to make them “sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”  MORE


The information below is by .  Read article here.

So, what do we know about the BC?  We know it is a forgery:

Evidence of Photo Editing

In order to observe the evidence that this image has undergone digital extraction and has been artificially superimposed onto an official looking background all anyone needs to do is to open the original White House provided PDF and then zoom in to look at the details around the text and other artifacts.  In the screenshots provided below I have increased the zoom level to 400% to examine the document more closely.  In each of these examples I have annotated the screenshots as follows:

  • Blue Arrows are used to point out various distortions and pixelations within the document image.  These distortions are artifacts of the compression algorithm used in the PDF document itself and are not evidence of anything beyond the fact the an image has been compressed.
  • Red Arrows are used to highlight telltale evidence that what you are looking at is an image which was digitally extracted from some source document and then superimposed onto the background.

Why is this latter point important?  Simply because we know that the image is not a direct scan of an original source document and, given that it has been altered we cannot say for certain what level of manipulation has been performed.  The image may be an accurate reflection of the contents of an original long form birth certificate, or it may be a complete fabrication.  There is simply no way to distinguish between the two.

he thing to notice with the red arrows is that all of the graphics and text in this image are surrounded by a thin border of pure white pixels.  This is a telltale sign that the text has been extracted from another document and that this is not text which was originally printed on this background.  This border of white around the text is an artifact of the automated algorithm which was used to select the text for extraction before being superimposed on this background image.  Notice also that the centers of any “closed loops” such as that found in the center of the letter “O” or in the loops found on a captial “B” are also pure white and do not match the coloring that would normally be seen if this text had been physically printed on this background in its original state.


Now all of this is only evidence that the document provided has been electronically manipulated.  It says nothing about how much it was manipulated or why.  It may be that the Hawaii State Department of Health did the extraction and manipulation themselves as part of providing the original image via their standard operating procedures, but it is just as possible that this image was artificially constructed to look like an official document.  Given that the image is obviously the product of a photo editing technology there is no way to determine whether the information being displayed is a true representation of an actual document, or not.

Lack of an Official Seal

Another obvious item that jumps out at me is the lack of any official seal or impression near or around the signature.  For all officially certified documents I have ever seen there is always a raised seal or an official stamp bearing the seal of the state or agency issuing the document that is used to indicate the authenticity thereof.  Perhaps Hawaii does not adhere to this practice, I can’t say for sure, but it does raise question as to whether this is even an officially issued document.  Until this issue of the Hawaii State Department of Health’s official practice regarding the use of raised seals or stamps on these types of documents has been investigated the authenticity of this document should still be considered questionable.

Bottom Line

Regardless of whether this document was manipulated by the Hawaii State Department of Health, or someone else, unless a clear and unaltered version of the original source birth certificate is provided Obama is not going to be able to put this issue to rest.  There is far too much room with this current document for there to have been manipulation on the part of the Obama Administration and therefore the conspiracy theorists will not leave the matter alone.  Obama needs to provide clear and undeniable evidence that (a) he has a Certificate of Live Birth on record in Hawaii, and (b) that the certificate is not a forgery.

As I have said before, the only way to accomplish this is to give independent news agencies direct access to the original source document so that they can have an appropriate set of experts determine the authenticity of that document.  Short of that the conspiracy theorists will have a hey day with this issue.

I actually want to be able to put this matter behind us so that we can get on with the task of fixing our nation.  I am pleased that the President appears to be trying to cooperate in that regard.  Unfortunately the step he took today is unlikely to achieve that goal.

Let the media conduct their own independent investigation of the original source document if you ever wish to put this matter behind you once and for all.

Now regarding the SSN number, I can hear you diehard Snopes people all ginned up to answer the challenge. Well, one PI already did that:

You really need to click this link to access the full information.  I took all info below from this article. 


Private Investigators Respond To Snopes Article 
On Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number

Private Investigators respond to Leftist husband and wife team called Snopes regarding their latest piece on Obama’s Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants.

Response from private investigators Susan Daniels and Niel Sankey:

Susan Daniels: SNOPES is right. Obama is not using Jean Paul Ludwig’s CT social security number. He is using someone else’s. And in their delight in denouncing the use of Ludwig’s, they include a new addition to the Social Security Administration’s website that says a person does not have to live in the state for which the number has been set aside. That was never written there before Obama’s fraudulent use of his number was challenged.

Attached in the current information at SSA for filing for a number is the following. “NOTE: If you are age 12 or older and have never received a Social Security number, you must apply in person.”

Obama allegedly got his CT number of 042-68-4425 in March ’77, which can be proven since the person before him -4424 and after him -4429 both got theirs then.

Next is: “Show an address where you can receive you card 7 to 14 days from now” and a web address “to find the Social Security office or Social Security Card Center that serves your area.” Is there a single rational person in this country who believes a fifteen year old flew from HI to CT to get a social security number when he could have gotten his there?

Later this month they are going to start issuing the cards randomly. I think to prevent exactly what happened with Obama and his phony number. They were never randomly assigned before.

For him to have a CT number, there has to be at the SSA a form SS-5 that is hand-written (like the other numbers around his) and has a CT address where he was living. It doesn’t exist. Now that we have seen the phony “birth certificate,” let’s see the phony SS-5.

The other documents, which are self-explanatory, are a compilation of those I have found and some that were sent to me. The important documents included his falsified Selective Service application and the Selective Service Verification, which is a government run site. Of course, you won’t be able to pull up Obama’s because they shut his down — but not until after I printed it. You will find on it the last four numbers of his CT SSN. You can test its accuracy if you were in the military. Google Selective Service Verification, input the required information and watch yours Selective Service information pop up. -Private Investigator Susan Daniels

Neil Sankey: I will simply agree with, and support what Susan says.

This Ludwig story was not of my doing either, and I had no part in it, it was well subsequent to the compilation of lists and other data. I am firmly of the belief that these matters should be thoroughly and properly investigated, but by the correct Authorities who have the power to access the necessary material at source, i.e. the FBI, CIA etc. My job, as a concerned citizen with experience in this field is to raise the matter and present it for such investigation. I also performed that function with the lists I provided to Doctor Taitz, which are now exhibits in her lawsuits. They are not verified, or presented as being accurate, other than that that is the data that is available in public record. It should / MUST be properly investigated by the proper Authorities. If not THEY must answer to God (they took the oath) and the American People,whom they are supposed to protect. -Private Investigator Neil SANKEY

More details on Obama’s Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants can be found here.

Don’t miss this video:


Obama is a traitor, liar, tool of some shadow group seeking to destroy America.  The media has been hi-jacked and won’t allow this to come out.  American’s are afraid to be called names it appears and thus you won’t even investigate or stand for the truth anymore and one day you WILL answer for your cowardice.



One comment on “The Fake President : Obama is a LIE

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s