There is a war going on and many understand different aspects of it, but when examined in total the only logical explanation is that there is an absolute full on assault through the new age movement and science to undermine Christianity via fantastic tales and hoaxes which they seek to hide via their compliant media whores. When an anthropological hoax is revealed it becomes news for a week and then it’s forgotten. Later, that same idea is still taught to children in schools to support the theory of evolution. The natural outcome of that theory is to create disbelief in young children.
Rules are not fun. Many children will do anything to test the boundaries of their parents rules. It’s actually a safety mechanism because if the boundary is real then the child can trust their parent. If the parent does not enforce a rule then the child cannot trust the parent. Now, if education can come along and sow seeds of disbelief in a most logical way, then the child can learn to distrust their parents judgment and if their parent is a Christian then it’s easier to dismiss this idea of God and the gift of salvation in Jesus. Once you get rid of that notion then situational ethics is perfectly logical and there is no right or wrong. After generations of this we have the outcome of lying politicians and a country in ruins. This was the plan all along of the Marxist communists in their plan to destroy America from within through demoralization, destabilization, crisis and then normalization as explained by the Russian KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov when he explained the true purpose of their system. These globalists do have a plan for the world. We are seeing the final pieces falling into place today. Once the crisis hits the effects of demoralization and destabilization will be realized when the totalitarian control of the world takes place. Anyone who will not comply will be seen as a traitor to humanity. These individuals will be seen as the enemy to mankind, peace, and utopia. The logical step is to remove these people and they will believe they are doing good ultimately.
The problem with evolution is that it is used to teach how life began when that was not even Darwin’s starting point. Darwin’s theory begins after life is here and tries to show that we all come from a common ancestor. My recent blog post about Intelligent Design shows the myriad of problems with Darwin’s ideas when one understands just what is necessary for cellular function. I believe, that had Darwin known this information, he would never have presented his theory because of the fact that for life to begin by chance in some chemical soup would be a one in a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion chance! It just could not happen by chance alone. Amazingly, one of the chief proponents of evolution, Dawkins author of “God Delusion”, actually gives credence to aliens seeding life on earth!
Anything but God. What are these hoaxes that have been used to prop up this idea of evolution?
“Piltdown Man” was presented to the world as the missing link proving evolution. But, what do we now know about the “Piltdown Man”?
A fossil human skull found near Piltdown, England, in 1912. It was taken from a gravel pit cut into an ancient alluvial fan. The deposit itself probably dates from the third glaciation but contains much older materials washed in from higher levels. The skull while exceedingly thick and showing some primitive characteristics is essentially that of modern man (ibid., volume 15, p. 782).
Dr. Don Boys clarified information on the Piltdown Man and it’s discover:
The evolutionists, flushed and excited, pointed to their “missing link” for more than 40 years [from 1912 until 1953], and boasted about it in all the textbooks as being “proof of evolution.” In fact more than 500 doctoral dissertations were written on Piltdown Man, seeking to establish him as one of the most impressive “finds” in the history of science…[But] in 1953, three honest scientists found that the modern ape’s jaw and human skull had been “doctored” to resemble an ape man, and the fake [had] fooled the world’s greatest experts! The persons responsible for the hoax (fraud) some allege, were [Charles] Dawson [himself – the man who “found” the fossil] and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin who had written several books trying to harmonize evolution and [Catholicism] (Don Boys, Ph.D., Evolution: Fact, Fraud or Faith, Largo, Florida: Freedom Publications, 1994, pp. 259-260).
Dr. Boys pointed out that the British Museum, where the “fossil” was stored, prevented it from being examined by experts for over forty years (ibid., p. 261). Dr. Henry M. Morris points out that Pierre Teilhard de Chardin has been “implicated by a number of his fellow evolutionists as one of the perpetrators of the infamous Piltdown Man hoax” (Henry M. Morris, Ph.D., The Long War Against God, Master Books, 2000, p. 23). De Chardin was one of the leading evolutionists of the twentieth century.
Dr. Michael Pitman writes:
Only in 1953, when a method for determining the age of fossil bones by analyzing their fluorine content was revived, were critical tests carried out on the Piltdown fossils. The human skull and ape-like jaw, contradicting updated ideas about man’s evolution, had aroused suspicion. They were found to be of commensurate [equal] age but much younger than the other fossils and articles which were supposed to have been found. Most of the specimens had been artificially stained with bichromate [a saline solution derived from potassium. The specimens had been artificially stained to give them the appearance of great age]. The canine tooth had been filed, coloured and packed [artificially] with grains of sand. An elephant bone associated with the skull, of a type found…in Egypt, had been cut with steel instruments into an improbable “bat” shape. The Piltdown skull was a deliberate fraud. The faking of the mandible and canine was skilful and deliberate: it was certainly a determined and unscrupulous hoax. Sir Solly Zuckerman, who later reviewed the story, considered the hoaxer knew more about primate anatomy than the experts who were several times deluded (Michael Pitman, Adam and Evolution, London: Century Hutchinson, Ltd., 1984; reprinted by Baker Book House, 1987, p. 93).
Who was responsible for this hoax? Charles Dawson, a Sussex lawyer, who led the excavation, was twice “surprised…in his office staining bones” by two paleontologists who did not trust him (p. 93). Arthur Smith Woodward was the head of the anthropology department at the British Museum – who collaborated with Dawson. Although he was an expert on fish bones, Woodward was “certainly not an anthropologist” (ibid., p. 91). Teilhard is the third man. All three, Dawson, Woodward, and Teilhard, took part in the “discovery.” The tooth, filed down from that of an elephant from Tunisia, was almost certainly supplied by Teilhard, who had visited the place where these elephants are buried in Tunisia. Michael Pitman tells us,
Dawson was certainly at the bottom of it but probably didn’t know enough of primate anatomy to do the job well. Others from the British Museum may have been involved [this would explain why the “fossil” was kept under lock and key for so many years, and even such [leading] anthropologists as Dr. Louis Leakey were not allowed to examine it, ibid,. p. 93], and Teilhard de Chardin almost certainly planted the [ground-down and stained elephant] tooth (ibid., p. 94).
Thus, Eoanthropus dawsonii (Dawson’s Dawn Man) was proved to be a hoax. Why did these men create this fraud? The answer is simple: they were trying to find “missing links” to prove the theory of evolution. When they couldn’t find any in Britain, they created one – to try to prove the theory of evolution. But you can’t “prove” this theory with hoaxes!
“And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables” (II Timothy 4:4). SOURCE
How many people had their faith destroyed because of this hoax? This is not the only one, and I want you to consider that if science needs to hoax us into believing the theory of evolution, can you trust these people? They control higher education and lower education! These are the people influencing your children. Anyone who questions evolution is looked at as some backwards thinking knuckle dragging bible thumper. You have met these pseudo intellectuals who can’t be bothered with watching an hour long video on intelligent design or discuss this topic without spewing insults and hatred towards the questioning observer. Let us explore some more!
One of Darwin’s contemporaries was Earnst Haeckel. His embryo drawings have been in all major biology books for ages. He tried to show that because embryos look so similar that we have a common ancestor, but it’s just not true.
Read this article about the use of these bogus drawings.
Images are hard to forget, and if you were never aware that scientists now disregard these images, then you have it in your mind without even realizing it when faced with such logical sounding arguments. I remember being shown these images when I was in k-12 up to 1983. It is only by my own independent study that I found out they were fraudulent! Are your children still exposed to this today?
This short video talks about this issue:
So, this evolution God denying Intelligent design denying anthropologist in that video blows this off as just an easy way to demonstrate a point. She is absolutely correct. What is that point exactly? That evolution is real and damn the facts, it supports our theory! Is this honest and trustworthy education or indoctrination to subordinate a child’s trust in their parents and their faith? I present that it is the latter.
On receiving a tooth [found in Nebraska] from a Mr. Harold Cook, H. F. Osborn (head of the American Museum of Natural History) declared it had characteristics which were a mixture of human, chimpanzee and pithecanthropus. He named it Hesperopithecus haroldcookii (Harold Cook’s Evening Ape). In Britain Sir Grafton Elliott Smith fully supported him and, on the basis of a single tooth, there appeared in the Illustrated London Times (24 June 1922) a center-spread of an artist’s impression of “man-ape” Hesperopithecus cavorting with his wife. [Nearly everyone believed in “Nebraska Man” in 1922].
You want to know just how stupid these liars think you are? That tooth was discovered in 1930 to be that of an extinct pig! This subterfuge has continued right up to the 1980’s .
A skull, found in Spain and promoted as the oldest example of [man] in Eurasia, was later identified as that of a young donkey [This was in 1984]. (Pitman, ibid., p. 100).
A report from the Los Angeles Times recently had the byline, “Once Hailed as a Missing Link, Forgery is Found to be Mosaic of Fossils from Microraptor and a Bird” (Los Angeles Times, December 2, 2002, p. A12). Here are the highlights of that news report:
NEW YORK – When the smuggled stone slab first surfaced at a Tucson mineral show, it seemed the likely key to a mystery of evolution.
To the collector who paid $80,000 for it, the Chinese fossil had every appearance of a feathered dinosaur that flew like a modern bird. The purported missing link made headlines when National Geographic trumpeted the find in 1999, then caused red faces when it was revealed as a forgery a year later.
Researchers in China and at the American Museum of Natural History in New York now have completely deciphered the deception.
The find wrongly hailed as a crucial link between the dinosaurs and the birds actually does contain fossils of a dinosaur and a bird. But the only connection between them is glue.
In a study published recently in the journal Nature, the researchers revealed that the major part of the doctored fossil belongs to an ancient, fish-eating bird called Yanornis martini. Its lizard-like tail belongs to a small, carnivorous dinosaur previously identified as Microraptor zhaoianus. Both creatures lived and died more than 110 million years ago.
Working with Julia A. Clarke at the American Museum of Natural History, [paleontologist Zhonghe Zhou of Beijing] compared the front half of the forged fossil with the only two known specimens of the long-extinct bird. The researchers compared more than 200 features to pinpoint the creature’s true identity.
Suspicions about these bones of contention were first confirmed when X-ray analysis revealed that the fossil was a mosaic made from 88 fragments of rock and fossil leaved together in three layers and glued to a single supporting slab of shale. Grout had been used to fill any gaps…. a hoax to deliberately mislead scientists, as was the case with the infamous Piltdown Man.
In that 1912 incident, a researcher deliberately altered a set of human and orangutan bones to make them seem to be remains from the same creature, then buried them in an English quarry. When they were dug up, they were hailed as a missing link between ape and modern mankind. The hoax distorted scientific ideas on the descent of man for almost 40 years. SOURCE
One of the latest hoaxes is the Peppered Moth:
The latest Darwinian “evidence” to bite the dust: the peppered moth. Most high school biology textbooks today cite this creature as a proof of evolution…According to the evolutionary scenario, the peppered moth rests on tree trunks during the day. Industrial pollution blackened the tree trunks, making the dark moths invisible to preying birds, which caused them to become the dominant variety. Later, pollution controls caused the light variety to resurge.
Biologist Jonathan Wells, who holds PhDs from Yale and Berkeley, exposes the myth of the peppered moth in his book Icons of Evolution (Washington, DC: Regnery, 2000). As it turns out, peppered moths do not rest on tree trunks during the day. In some studies, this was faked by gluing and pinning dead moths to trees and photographing them.
(James Perloff, The Case Against Darwin, Refuge Books, 2002, p. 59).
So, my friends, we have stained monkey bones, pigs teeth, an elephant tooth, donkey’s head, glued together fossils, and moths glued and pinned to trees in a desperate effort to prove a theory of a man whose only formal degree was in theology. You see, Darwin didn’t even have a degree in science.
“Naturalist Alfred Russell Wallace admitted that he received the basic tenets of the Darwinian…heresy while in an occult trance in a Malaysian jungle. It does not take a theologian to figure out the identity of the revealer…Modern evolution is simply the continuation of Satan’s long war against God” (Henry M. Morris, Ph.D., The Long War Against God, Master Books, 2000, p. 10).
What about LUCY?
The above image is what they created the image of Lucy from. Now, how do you get hands and feet from that? Note the human like appearance on her face and the human hands and feet! Years later, more skeletons were discovered and guess what? The hands and feet were ape like with locking wrists for using hands to talk like and ape!
Neanderthal man, another deliberate fraud by evolutionist scientists.
“If it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is.” Most of us have heard this piece of advice on more than one occasion. Yet, this was exactly the case with a famous Neanderthal fossil discovered in a peat bog near Hamburg, Germany. Prior to its discovery, the evolutionary timeline of ape-like creatures remained extremely “fuzzy” as it approached modern man. There simply were not any fossils that shed light on this period. But a single discovery dated by Professor Reiner Protsch cleared up the picture. Many years ago, he was invited to date the famous skull, which he later pronounced to be the vital missing link between Neanderthals and modern humans. He dated the skull at 36,000 years old, allowing it to fall neatly into the evolutionists’ timeline between Neanderthals and modern man. Finally, thanks to Protsch, the gap had been filled. All the pieces were in place.
For evolutionists, it was too good to be true. And indeed, it was. On February 18, 2005, Protsch was forced to retire in disgrace after a Frankfurt University panel ruled he had “fabricated data and plagiarized the work of his colleagues” (see “Anthropologist Resigns in ‘Dating Disaster,’ ” 2005). Once believed to be a world-renowned expert on carbon dating, Protsch’s entire professional career is now being questioned. The university noted: “The commission finds that Prof. Protsch has forged and manipulated scientific facts over the past 30 years” (“Anthropologist Resigns…”).
Protsch’s work first attracted suspicion when scientists at Oxford wanted to double-check the authenticity of his dates and verify the ages of many previously reported fossils using modern techniques. Oxford officials insist that this “dating disaster” was discovered during a routine examination, and was not an attempt to discredit Professor Protsch. The fossils he had dated were just in a long line of others that were being rechecked. According to Thomas Terberger, the archaeologist who discovered the hoax: “[A]nthropology is going to have to completely revise its picture of modern man between 40,000 and 10,000 years ago” (as quoted in Harding, 2005). He continued: “Prof. Protsch’s work appeared to prove that anatomically modern humans and Neanderthals had co-existed, and perhaps even had children together. This now appears to be rubbish” (emp. added).
But the Neanderthal skull was not the only forgery Oxford discovered. Protsch also had paraded “Binshof-Speyer” woman before the public, stating that she was 21,300 years old. Yet the new Oxford date puts this woman living at 1,300 B.C. Protsch also claimed that “Paderborn-Sande Man” walked the Earth 27,400 B.C., and yet the corrected figure reveals that he died only a couple hundred years ago—in A.D. 1750! Futhermore, Protsch also is being investigated for a scandal in which he allegedly tried to sell 280 chimpanzee skulls to individuals in the United States for $70,000.
According to the World Net Daily Web site, Rudolf Steinberg, Frankfurt University’s president, “apologized for the University’s failure to curb Protsch’s misconduct for decades. ‘A lot of people looked the other way,’ he said.” But what good does that apology do when it comes to unraveling the lie that was sold to the public for so many years? The article went on to report: “Chris Stringer, a Stone Age specialist and head of human origins at London’s Natural History Museum, said: ‘What was considered a major piece of evidence showing that the Neanderthals once lived in northern Europe has fallen by the wayside. We are having to rewrite prehistory’ ” (2005). How many times must we rewrite evolutionary history? Don’t students deserve better? Don’t we all deserve better?
Neandethal man, just a modern human with disease.
After discovering the first Neanderthal skullcap in 1856 in the Neander Valley near Dusseldorf, Germany, German anatomist Ruldolph Virchow said in essence that the fossil was the remains of a modern man afflicted with rickets and osteoporosis. In 1958, at the International Congress of Zoology, A.J.E. Cave stated that his examination of the famous Neanderthal skeleton established that it was simply an old man who had suffered from arthritis. Francis Ivanhoe authored an article that appeared in Nature titled “Was Virchow Right About Neanderthal?” (1970). Virchow had reported that the Neanderthal’s ape-like appearance was due to a condition known as rickets, which is a vitamin-D deficiency characterized by overproduction (and deficient calcification) of bone tissue. The disease causes skeletal deformities, enlargement of the liver and spleen, and generalized tenderness throughout the body. Dr. Cave noted that every Neanderthal child’s skull that had been studied up to that point in time apparently was affected by severe rickets. When rickets occurs in children, it commonly produces a large head due to late closure of the epiphysis and fontanels.
At the end of the above video, the gentleman explains how mutations cannot build complex structures and rarely is a mutation in the creatures best interest. If you were told today that your child had a mutated gene would you be excited that they were going to be the next evolutionary step or worried about what struggles your child would have? You know the answer if you are honest! When is a mutation in your best interest? Darwin’s theory is nothing more than an attempt to undermine faith in God, and I submit to you that it takes a lot more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in a divine intelligent creator who loves us.