Britain Poisoning it’s Citizens forcefully

The brainwashing of Americans and the English regarding the use of fluoride to prevent cavities has been one of the most successful psy ops ever!  The evidence of the negative health effects of fluoride is over-whelming and yet our governments continue to force us to ingest industry waste by-products called fluoride!  It’s POISON!  Read this short article:

British Government Wants to Force People to Drink Fluoridated Water, Even if they Have No Teeth

by
April 26th, 2014
The American Dental Association (ADA) and UK version of this agency, the British Dental Association (BDA), along with government agencies have long touted the benefits of fluoridating municipal water supplies to keep everyone’s teeth pearly white and without cavities, but what if you have no teeth? Truthfully, it doesn’t matter; fluoride is a toxic substance that shouldn’t be forced on the population, but even people without teeth are pushed to consume fluoride.Local officials are being asked by government agencies in the UK to fluoridate their water again, even though millions currently drink unfluoridated water. Only 6.1 million people in the UK currently drink fluoridated water, some of it being naturally fluoridated instead of forcibly tinkered with by adding sodium fluoride, a leftover from the fertilizer and mining industries. That amounts to only 10% of the entire population.Why exactly the government would want to poison its people with fluoridated water when, as Dr. Hardy Limeback (and countless others), the former president of the Canadian Association for Dental Research says, “The evidence that fluoridation is more harmful than beneficial is now overwhelming,” is anyone’s guess.As Dr. David Carlsson, former Nobel Laureate in Medicine has said, there is no reason to use fluoride in municipal water supplies as an ‘excuse’ to boost dental health. “Fluoridation goes against all principles of pharmacology. It is obsolete.”

Nonetheless, Health Secretary for the UK, Alan Johnson, says it’s time to improve England’s dental health, and urged putting fluoride in local drinking water to help reduce tooth decay in children, especially in poor areas. He also stressed that only three areas of the UK currently enjoy poisonous fluoridated water, and that “We need to go much further in areas where dental health needs to be improved.”

Why exactly do countries keep trying to use dental health as a reason to put a toxic substance in the water? Public Health England recently published a report stating that fluoridating water was not only good for dental health, but also good for other health benefits. Who are they kidding?

As the columnist of a Telegraph article discussing the subject points out, the science on this subject is anything but clear cut, so why would you want to put something that’s possibly toxic in water at all? Recent studies show that it lowers IQ scores and causes neurodegeneration. Even if fluoridation did help to improve dental health, would that be worth crippling an entire population mentally?

UK government officials would be wise to consider the fate of the former mayor of Andover, Gordon Simpson. At his town’s municipal elections he was swept out of his office by enraged anti-fluoride activists that didn’t want to take a chance ingesting an industrial waste in their water. The former mayor, Olive Harvey was so appalled at the idea of adding fluoride to her own city water, she sank a borehole into the garden of her home so she could bypass it, thereby avoiding drinking polluted water full of nasty chemicals. Andover has been fluoride-free ever since.

Even when public health officials publish encouraging data about fluoride efficacy, they face fierce local objections. Back in the 1990s a major battle broke out over water fluoridation in the North East of the UK. Over 70% of the population backed fluoridating the water supply after city officials convinced them it was safe, but Northumbria Water rejected the proposal to fluoridate the water fearing being sued.

In this case, large masses of people do not want their water fluoridated, so suggesting it is a very unwise political move. City council members should take heed. The masses will not be poisoned willingly. Even if you have no teeth, you still need your brain.

 

County in Florida Rejects Spending $800,000 to Fluoridate Water Supply

I am very excited to report that finally, one Florida county has voted against putting fluoride in their water supply.  I think it’s come down to the fact that they don’t want to pay $800,000.00 dollars to do it, but nonetheless it is a victory for them personally, and one for us nationally!  I cannot tell you how happy I am to read this news:

by
May 15th, 2014

water faucet toxic rejected 263x164 County in Florida Rejects Spending $800,000 to Fluoridate Water SupplyAbout 60,000 households in Hernando County, Florida were debating on spending $800,000 in tax-payer money to poison themselves with fluoride a few months ago. According to Susan Goebel-Canning, the county’s director of environmental services, this is what it would cost to put the leftovers from the phosphate fertilizer and semiconductor industries into everyone’s water. Thankfully, they decided against fluoridating the water supplies.

It boils down to spending $30,000 per treatment plant and multiplying that by 27 – the number of plants the county would need to treat all its water. People on a well system would be unaffected, but 60,000 people in the county would be drinking fluoridated water – which has been proven to be toxic, and extremely harmful to human health.

Even the American Medical Association once told the truth about fluoride:

“Fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, probably because of their capacity to modify the metabolism of cells by changing the permeability of the cell membrane and by inhibiting certain enzyme systems.” – Journal of the American Medical Association, Sept 18, 1943, Editorial

Yet, somehow Big Industry has convinced the world, through brainwashing the American Dental Association and health authorities in every nation, as well as lying to politicians, that fluoride is safe:

Rejection: 5 Fluoride Victories of 2014

“As a toxicologist involved in fluoride research for over ten years, I was stunned by the Calgary Regional Health Authority’s glib comments proclaiming water fluoridation safe. The ‘fifty years’ of studies about fluoride safety, do not exist. The “ongoing intensive research on fluorides and fluoridation’, does not exist, certainly none investigating safety.” – Dr. P. Mullenix, Ph.D.

“I am neither for or against fluoride,” Goebel-Canning said. “I will support what is best for the citizens of the county and respect the decision of the county commission.”

Many residents of Florida have been against mandatory water fluoridation, nonetheless a nearby county decided to fluoridate their water when Brooksville City Council members voted 4-1 last year to add the chemical to the water. There was vigorous debate leading up to that vote, but apparently it fell on deaf ears.

Three county commissioners of Hernando have decided not to fluoridate the water supplies, similar to Dallas, TX, which is considering ending 5 long decades of city water fluoridation.

Sgt Maj Dan Page: 1000 Russian Spetsnaz Arriving Monthly!

I really don’t know what to think about this report from this gentleman who is a recent retiree from the U.S. Army.  He is making some very alarming statements about what is about to happen in America.  I provide it for you to consider.  Watch / listen to the videos.  I do not see a lot of proof for what he is saying.

 

 

 

U.S. Energy and Mining Production : THE THORIUM PROBLEM

The U.S. manufacturing and mining of rare earth minerals has been severely curtailed due to the Thorium disposal problem.  China has no such concerns and thus has cornered the rare earth mineral and special batteries we use in many devices such as cell phones.  How dangerous is Thorium?  This 28 minute video shows the issues and how America is being screwed out of major mining and rare earth industry.  Thorium is a highly dense energy source in itself, and we are NOT doing anything to use it!  The truth is this reactor cannot explode or melt down!  It uses 99% of the material, and we have it stockpiled as WASTE!

John Kutsch of Thorium Energy Alliance and Jim Kennedy of Three Consulting review the hazards maintaining U.S. current thorium policy. Heavy Rare Earth Element mining is impeded. Energy sector innovation is stifled. Thorium is less dangerous, less radioactive, and less easily metabolized than many elements we are exposed to on a daily basis.

Current regulation assists China’s capture of high-tech manufacturing sector. Current regulation protects incumbent U.S. [light] rare earth producers who DISPOSE of thorium and valuable heavy rare earths in tailing ponds. Current regulation does NOT facilitate growth of U.S. economy.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle recognize reform is needed. No one is willing to introduce legislation to address the thorium problem. China continues to capture high-tech manufacturing jobs. U.S. private corporations are unable to pursue thorium an an energy resource.  They are highly compact facilities and could be used to double the worlds supply of energy!  Imagine your energy / gas bill dropping by half! America is chock full of Thorium.

 

What is stopping the development of Thorium reactors? Government regulation is stopping the development of these facilities. The Chinese will eventually overtake this, and close the door on our opportunity to run any reactors more inexpensively than them!    I wonder what deals the U.S. government is making with China for mineral rights in the mid west which is our highest density area of Thorium deposits!  Who is selling us out?  The U.S. Congress and Big Business are the ones to watch.

Do not miss this video:

 

 

 

 

 

Traveling Security : YOUR LUGGAGE IS NOT SAFE!!!

If you travel, then you want to watch this next video.  Schapelle Corby spent years in a Bali prison (Indonesia) because airport personnel used her luggage as a mule and for whatever reason did not intercept it in Australia to pull out the pot.  When she got to Bali for her vacation, her boogy board bag was full of pot!  She was wrongfully jailed for years in prison. You can watch her horrendous story, and the betrayal of an Australian citizen by her government here:

 

Expendable

60 minutes short video

 

Now, what if you just don’t want TSA or someone else to steal your belongings?  Then use a non-zipper bag.  Yes, it will weigh more, but what is your stuff worth to you?  What is your life and that of your family worth to you?

 

Defeat Dishonest Baggage Handlers

 

 

 

TSA THIEVES IN ACTION

 

 

 

 

Ukraine : the rest of the story

In every crisis event look for one thing…. Money.  Follow the money and you will soon understand what has happened.  In the recent Nevada debacle over some cows and land rights where the force of the government came against a lone rancher, Cliven Bundy, we soon realized that Senate Democrat Leader Harry Reid’s son was working with the Chinese for those land rights in a 5 BILLION dollar deal.

Now, let us examine a new fact about the Ukraine.  There is a growing civil war there, and Russia is flexing her muscles.  Did you know the Ukraine has a lot of gas and energy resources?  Guess who is involved in that industry now?   I introduce you to R. Hunter Biden, son of Vice President Joe Biden!  The pieces begin to fall into place.

 

The article you want to read is titled, “The Farce Is Complete: Joe Biden’s Son Joins Board Of Largest Ukraine Gas Producer”.  This man has more titles and jobs than you can possibly imagine.  He is named head of this and that to the point you have to wonder what the hell he is drinking and eating to be so active.  Of course, logic dictates that he cannot possibly do all of this, so what’s really going on with R. Hunter Biden? Could he possibly be the one getting the money funneled to him so Vice President Biden does not appear to be receiving favors?  Could this be why Biden is so outspoken against Russia in the Ukraine issues?

All I can say is that nothing is as it seems on the surface. Dig more deeply, react very slowly to new, and find out as many facts you can before forming an opinion.

 

More reading opportunities on this topic:

Buzzfeed

The Moscow Times

Palestinian State Rejection : The Truth

Every time you hear a new story about how evil Israel is and how abused Palestinians are, please think of this very educational video.  The truth is, the State of Israel has offered 3 times to create a Palestinian state including giving up Eastern Jerusalem to be their capital!  The answer every time is “NO”!   The fact is the Nation of Jordan is the land given to them!  It much bigger than Israel, and yet the Arabs have never accepted the Jews having a nation.  That is the ultimate fact in all of this.  The Arabs want Israel dead and the nation to be forgotten.

 

“I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse those who curse you” ….. God said that.

Why The Global Warming Agenda Is Wrong

This is the clearest explanation of why the Global Warning alarmists are wrong, and what it’s costing us.  Why are they doing this? The answer is simple: The redistribution of wealth to control the first world countries:

 

Sandy Hook School Shooting Lies and the Truth : What are Professionals Asking?

I don’t believe the story the government is putting out about the Sandy Hook shooting.  Some concerned citizens spoke at the Sandy Hook School board meeting.  The comments made are very important, and the information following this video should make you re-examine what actually happened at Sandy Hook and why we are being lied to.  These are serious professionals questioning the events at Sandy Hook!  I also hope you watch each video.  This first video is very interesting.  You have all these people talking and then the last couple of people seem to be put in place to lay the “crazy” out there.  You have this woman talking complete BS about shamans and mental illness being a gift and then immediately after her you have a supposed “New Town Resident” talking about how he has police friends and knows families that lost children and then blasting the crazy woman and the guy in the stupid outfit!  So, the last thing you hear in this video is some stupid crazy woman and a respectable New Town resident basically tearing down everything brought up.  Maybe he is a New Town resident. Maybe he does care or maybe he is playing his role too.

They won’t answer legal Freedom of Information Requests.  They won’t answer simple questions asked by Wolfgang Halbig:

 

 

Wolf raises some important questions:

Additional studies support the conclusion that this had not been an operating school for several years. One of the reasons for confronting the School Board, therefore, is that its members cannot not know that the school was virtually abandoned and had been awaiting future demolition.

Wolf’s 16 Questions

From all of the attempts to discredit Wolf, one might infer that he is some kind of radical out to stir up concerns where none are warranted. But the issues that he has raised appear to be very simple and straightforward, which are raised by published accounts, press reports and the video record. Here are sixteen:

1. Who on 14 December 2012 was the Incident Commander as required by the Federal Emergency Management Administration in directing the Mass Casualty Shooting Incident at the Sandy Hook Elementary School?

2. Who and Why did they not request the Life Star Helicopters knowing that children and school staff are seriously injured and clinging to life?

3. Who and Why did they not allow the Paramedics and the EMTs inside the Sandy Hook School to treat any seriously injured children and school staff clinging to life?

4. Who declared all eighteen children and six school staff members legally dead within the first eight minutes? [NOTE: Two were claimed to have been transported to a local hospital before they died. The purported shooter, Adam Lanza, and his mother, Nancy Lanza, are not included in this count.]

5. Who was the Certified Environmental Bio-Hazard Decontamination company contracted by the Newtown Public Schools to remove gallons of blood, skull fragments, brain tissues, bodily fluids, blood soaked carpets and decontaminate areas inside the Sandy Hook School?

6. Why does an off duty Lieutenant from the Newtown Police Department refuse to leave his off duty work assignment at a construction site on 14 December 2012 after hearing that shots have been fired at the Sandy Hook Elementary School?

7. Who at the Newtown Public Schools notified all of the parents in writing (as required by CT law) that had children attending the Sandy Hook Elementary School as well as every school staff member every school year of all the potential life threatening chemical hazards? [NOTE: The school had high levels of lead paint throughout the entire school, Asbestos in the ceiling tiles and floor tiles, asbestos in the insulation and, most of all, the school had a very high levels of PCB. Check out what PCB is and it should scare any parent.]

8. Who provided the urgent medical care for the two children who were not transported to the Danbury Trauma Center until an hour after the school was deemed safe for that 15-mile drive?

9. Who treated those two children who had been shot multiple times–as many as 3 to 11 times–since they did not allow the paramedics and EMTs inside the Sandy Hook Elementary School?

10. Why did the parents of the two children who died at the Danbury Trauma Center not allow their children to donate their organs to other children waiting for the gift of life?

11. What happened to the 500 children and 60 school staff members from Sandy Hook Elementary School on 14 December 2012?

12. Who was the police officer calling into the Newtown Police dispatcher stating in his words that he has multiple weapons, he has a rifle and a shotgun and who has the rifle and the shotgun as the chain of evidence should show that was found in Classroom 8?

13. Why would a police officer by the name of Lt Vangehle at 9:45:21 am on 14 December 2012 from the Newtown Police Department after finding a kindergarten female child in the hallway make her go into Classroom 8 and leave her? That was a gruesome crime scene with dead children and school staff. Who would do that?

14. Why would two CT State Troopers enter Classroom 10 at 9:55:31 am on 14 December 2012–which was a gruesome crime scene with dead bodies of children and school staff–and tell a kindergarten boy who they find in the bathroom whose name is redacted and tell them so it must be more than one to stay and they will be both back when it is safe?

15. Who ordered the porta-potties that showed up at the scene of the crime about three hours after the event?

16. Who ordered the twenty-six Christmas trees that were stored behind the Firehouse on 14 December 2012 and then brought out to be decorated to commemorate the twenty-six reported victims?

This last question is remarkable by itself because, had the Firehouse been conducting a Christmas tree sale, it would have been normal to have had dozens and dozens of trees, not just the right number to equal the number of victims:

It is not just the improbability of having 26 trees for 26 victims, but that those trees were there before the shooting had taken place. Notice, too, that none of these questions is sensitive. So why won’t the authorities answer them?

The Enduring Cover-Up

During several debates about Sandy Hook, the first with Keith Johnson, the second with Michael Collins Piper–I emphasized the “Top Ten Reasons” that this appears to have been an elaborate hoax, including:

(1) that proof of death has been suppressed, (2) that emergency protocols were not followed, (3) that drill protocols were followed, (4) that there was foreknowledge of the event, (5) that there was confusion over what weapons were used, (6) that the suspect cannot possibly have carried out the shooting as claimed, (7) that strange behavior was displayed by officials, witnesses and relatives, (8) that there are many odd photos of participants, (9) that the crime scene was destroyed under conditions of secrecy, and (10) that some of the children even appear to have been featured as singers at the Super Bowl.

Here are four crucial cases, which, each on its own, ought to raise serious doubt that children were actually killed at Sandy Hook and support the inference that this was a drill. Taken together, they leave scant room for doubt about the truth of the matter, which Wolfgang Halbig will undoubtedly confirm during his visit to Newtown. What would it mean, after all, if none of his questions are answered and his access to information is curtailed? If Sandy Hook happened as claimed, then ongoing research will confirm it; and if it did not, the world–especially the American public–deserves to know.

Case One: The NYC Gold Shield Detective

Everyone-must-check-in-320x251

As I had explained in my opening statement during the first debate,  there are multiple visual indications that we are dealing with a drill, including a portable sign, “EVERYONE MUST CHECK IN”, which is the featured image in the “Top Ten Reasons” article; that almost everyone, including firemen, were wearing name tags on lanyards; and that virtually no one was in business dress or office clothing as though they had rushed to the scene from work.  On the contrary, they are almost all in casual or informal clothing, which would be appropriate for a drill.  And many of them are walking in circles, out one door of the Firehouse a 1/2 mile from the school and back in another, again and again, which Sofia Smallstorm captured in her brilliant video study, “Unraveling Sandy Hook”, which makes no sense if it had been a real event, but does if it was instead a drill.

Because Keith Johnson had contended that registration signs and name tags on lanyards were “standard police procedures” at crime scenes, I contacted Jim Rothstein, a Gold Shield Detective from New York City, whom I know from JFK research, and asked him if that was indeed a common practice or if he had ever heard of it being done.  His response was plain and simple: “No.”  We discussed it a bit more and it became obvious to me that he thought that was a ridiculous claim to make. So I was sure to include it during the later stages of our debate, which Piper simply ignored.

Case Two: The ATF Special Assistant

During the third round of the first debate, I also observed that, although the “official narrative” would have you believe that Adam Lanza was a firearms fanatic, ATF Special Assistant Agent Gene Marquez said that his agency “has not been able to uncover any evidence that the mother and the son were actively engaged in going to the gun ranges, practicing marksmanship, or anything of that nature.”

During the second hour of her interview with Mike Power, Joyce Riley mentions a Wall Street Journal article that stated they couldn’t find any evidence of Nancy or Adam Lanza going to any of the shooting ranges in that local area.  In a video, “No Gun Permit Under Nancy Lanza’s Name in public records, says TIME Magazine”, at 57 sec mark, there is a screen shot from TIME, saying that in a public records search, they could find no firearms or weapons permits under Nancy’s name:

 

Video description:  Published on Jan 11, 2013- So gun permit records are public knowledge, and major news outlets are unable to find any for Nancy Lanza. Not even for the AR-15 rifle? The police are saying that those guns were registered to her and she had permits for them, but apparently the public records themselves are not supporting their theories.

Case Three: The FBI’s former Top Shrink

The behavior of several of the key participants in the Sandy Hook event, including especially Gene Rosen, struck me and a number of others as highly inappropriate. Gene Rosen is one of the most prolific of the Sandy Hook media stars but has given animated and conflicting statements to a series of reporters (in English and Spanish). Considered a “good Samaritan” by the mainstream media, he reportedly harbored six children from the school.

I was so struck by the crucial role of Gene Rosen that I asked a friend of mine, Alen Salerian, M.D., who had originally contacted me about JFK research, for his evaluation of Gene Rosen’s testimony as presented in the video interview we included in “Top Ten Reasons”.  As the former head of the FBI Rapid Response Psychiatric Unit, I thought his opinions would clarify and illuminate what we have here:

 

He wrote back on the basis of his review of the Gene Rosen interview, which we had included in “Top Ten Reasons”:

Gene Rosen was a key witness who corroborated the official story of the Sandy Hook elementary school killings. Rosen reported that, six children after witnessing the murder of their teacher Vicky Soto sought refuge at his home.

Mr. Rosen had already heard gunfire from an automatic weapon.

According to Mr. Rosen, the kids seemed nervous while they drank orange juice and played with stuffed animals. He never called 911. It took 15 minutes or more for the kids to begin talking about the horrific events including the death of their teacher.

Obvious inconsistencies of Gene Rosen’s statement:

A.    For six kids for 15 minutes not to say anything about their frightening experience is both unlikely and psychologically impossible. Common response would be a disorganized emotional venting and vivid mental images of the events.

B.    It’s unlikely and illogical for an adult not to call 911 under these conditions.

C.   It is unlikely and illogical for an adult not to obtain further information from children under very unusual circumstances–an unplanned visit by six kids without an adult. It’s even more unlikely for an adult who had already heard gunfire not to call 911 nor to find out what had occurred.

D.   The You Tube video of Rosen contradicts his main claim that for 15 minutes he did not know what had happened. In this video–at 22 seconds–Rosen reports concerns about the dead teacher, Ms. Vicki Soto.

Based upon A, B, C and D, it is reasonable to conclude that Gene Rosen misrepresented the truth of what occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School. It is quite reasonable to consider that Mr. Rosen was intentionally misinforming the public and the movie was filmed even before the alleged school shootings. The key evidence to support this possibility is the error in the movie regarding the death of Vicky Soto. This error is consistent with a signature trait of preplanned crimes. For instance Pres. Kennedy’s death was published in The Christchurch Star in New Zealand before the president was assassinated. Also, BBC announced the collapse of the seventh building on 9/11 some 23 minutes before the actual collapse.

Of importance, engineered complex crimes share a common denominator of evidence of advanced planning as shown by Rosen’s video and actions.

Remarkably, even though this discussion was included in the fourth round of the first debate, Michael Collins Piper appeared to be oblivious and made no response at all to my invitation.

Here why Wolfgang has some serious concerns about the Sandy Hook shooting:

High Fat Diet = Better Sex

This is a really good video talking about the benefits of fat in your diet.  Help your body feel better, and amazingly, high fat ice cream apparently makes women naturally sexually minded.  I haven’t tried the “ice cream”  trick yet, but I will keep it in mind: