Cede & Company Own Everything

If you are a regular long time reader of this blog then the topic of who owns it all is not new.  In the past, I have trumpeted Walter Burien’s work on the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting (CAFR) Issue that shows that by collective investments of all government entities the people own all the stocks and bonds pretty much world wide including the stock exchanges which are themselves stocks!  Well, let’s back the train up a little bit folks!

It has not come to my attention that some shenanigans have been getting played out in the past few years that have changed who actually owns the stocks!  Grab a cup of coffee or a stiff drink, sit down, buckle up and prepare to be hit between the eyes with this little bit of news!

People a few decades back used to buy a stock and would receive a stock certificate in the mail.  When they went to sell said stock they would have to ship it off to a broker who would sell it for them.  That was a bit cumbersome as we moved to internet trading and thus brokerage firms would be an acting form of attorney for you and you the beneficiary of said stocks.  Then, rules were changed and now brokerage firms are no longer allowed to own stocks, but must put them in a “holding” account called “Cede & Company” or “Cede & Co.” and we have been told it’s some fictitious entity created to just make it easy to trade stocks quickly.  Well, that’s not quite the truth.  In fact the DTCC actually owns “Cede & Company” and thus all stocks put in their name are owned by them!

Now, hopefully they will play nice, but if you have any feelings that maybe private businesses might become less than honest and should the economy go down they might turn on their friends and claim ownership since all the stocks (60 TRILLION dollars worth) are in their name, then you might see things could be less than honest.  Here are some articles for you to read if you are so inclined:

Investors Hub



Scheming Bill & Hillary Clinton Caught Cheating the System

I helped a friend years ago set up a common law trust for her estate.  It is a legal way to get your money, property etc protected from the prying thieving hands of the IRS / government.  It’s legal, and I have no problem with people using trusts.  I do have a problem with politicians putting in huge death tax rates on American’s who do not understand these “loopholes” and yet these same politicians like the Clintons don’t pay their fair share!

It was believed back in the 80’s that while we understand the legal meaning in IRS title 26 code for the word “wage” is money earned from government service and therefore only government employees which includes congress, military and civil servants are legally obligated to pay income taxes on their “wages”, that then Senator Ted Kennedy actually had his trust sue him so he would not legally have to pay taxes on his congressional wages!  In fact, all Senator Kennedy had to do was not show up in court while his lawyer for HIS trust showed up and won the case, and thus garnished Senator Kennedy’s taxable earning.  Now, was I there? No I was not there, but that is how the story went, and just another example of how the big boys preach about us all paying our fair share while they wheel and deal to avoid paying anything!  So, what have the Clinton’s been up to?  You remember this when you think about voting for these so called bleeding heart liberals who have no problem telling everyone else to pay their fair share:

Tax-dodge road map for the 1 per cent: Hillary Clinton now a new impediment to her handlers' goal of positioning her as an everywoman in advance of the 2016 presidential campaign

Tax-dodge road map for the 1 per cent: Hillary Clinton now a new impediment to her handlers’ goal of positioning her as an every woman in advance of the 2016 presidential campaign

From Mail Online Uk

By David Martosko, U.s. Political Editor

Revealed: Bill and Hillary Clinton are dodging ‘death tax’ on their homes

despite campaigning to raise it


  • The Clinton employed a common tax-avoidance strategy in 2010 to shield their homes from the IRS when they die
  • Shifting ownership of real estate to ‘residence trusts’ excludes them from the calculations that determine how much estate tax Chelsea must pay
  • Hillary and Bill have both argued for higher estate taxes, and fought Republicans’ attempts to eliminate entirely what they call the ‘death tax’
  • A Bloomberg commentator said Tuesday that the move is legal and passes the ethics smell-test, but will be terrible optics for Hillary in 2016 
  • She and Bill, the former president, rake in $200,000 or more for every public speech they give

Bill and Hillary Clinton have been using a legal but dodgy tax loophole to evade the so-called ‘death tax’ that they both worked to raise, according to news reports published on Tuesday.

Despite Hillary’s frequent insistence that she has middle-class roots and identifies with ordinary Americans, she and her husband the former president have amassed a fortune likely valued in the tens of millions of dollars.

In order to shield that wealth from the federal government’s rapacious tax collectors at the IRS, they are using a financial planning strategy to shift ownership of their houses to a private trust, and then to their daughter Chelsea.

This leaves the power couple free to reap the tax advantage of making such a generous gift before they die, while they rent the property back from her at a bargain price.

She believes this because she can lie truthfully. She and Bill moved all their money into trusts, then cried “We’re broke!” This is how a sociopath thinks and acts, and this woman wants to run America further into the ground!

The scheme, now common among America’s famed ‘1 per cent,’ will put any increases in the properties’ value – so-called capital gains – outside of their estates, and therefore out of the IRS’s reach when they die.

It will also exclude most of the homes’ values from the IRS’s calculation that will determine how much of their estates is taxable.

Bloomberg News examined the Clintons’ financial disclosure statements and reported Tuesday that the couple made the move in 2010.

In their political lives, both Clintons have advocated for narrowing the loophole that they are now leveraging.

In August 2000, shortly before he left office, Bill Clinton vetoed a congressional bill that would have eliminated the estate tax. He insisted that Congress should ‘proceed on grounds of fiscal responsibility and fairness’ instead.

Hillary has been more direct, arguing during the 2008 presidential campaign season for a change in federal law that would expose more of wealthy Americans’ estates to the tax man.

Bloomberg TV’s Al Hunt rapped the quasi-populist Clintons on Tuesday – not for dodging taxes, but for being tone deaf to the image it projects to ordinary Americans.

‘Voters may have a problem with a potential presidential candidate who spends a lot of time talking about the problems of the middle class while hobnobbing with the “rich and privileged”,’ Hunt said.

‘It’s part of a larger problem that I think she has. … I don’t think there’s any ethical problem here. I think the optics are terrible, though.’

‘I think once you put that together with Hillary giving speeches for $200,000 to Goldman-Sachs, people start to say, “Wait a minute: Is she one of us or not?”‘

Beneficiary: Chelsea Clinton and her children will become ultra-wealthy and pay little in estate tax when her parents are deceased, thanks to a loophole that Bill and Hillary fought to eliminate

Beneficiary: Chelsea Clinton and her children will become ultra-wealthy and pay little in estate tax when her parents are deceased, thanks to a loophole that Bill and Hillary fought to eliminate.




Man of the people: Former President Bill Clinton and his wife are worth between $5 and $50 million -- the exact amount is unclear because the federal government allows politicians to disclose their finances in broad ranges of dollar amounts

Man of the people: Former President Bill Clinton and his wife are worth between $5 and $50 million — the exact amount is unclear because the federal government allows politicians to disclose their finances in broad ranges of dollar amounts



Federal estate taxes currently apply only to amounts over $5.34 million. Mrs. Clinton proposed lowering that cap to $3.5 million. She also argued that the top tax rate, paid only by the super-wealthy, should increase from 40 to 45 per cent.

President Obama has acquiesced to Congress, however, increasing the exemption amount to its current level and leaving rates alone.

Hillary Clinton’s 2007 position, that a high estate tax keeps America from becoming ‘dominated by inherited wealth,’ is ringing hollow in 2014, however.

After a guffaw-inducing gaffe in which she claimed she and President Clinton were ‘dead broke’ when they left the White House, her finances have been thrust into the national spotlight.

They both have raked in $200,000 or more per paid speech, and Hillary received a reported $14 million book-advance deal for her recent tome ‘Hard Choices,’ which has sold poorly.

The power couple have a net worth between $5 and $50 million. The exact amount is unclear because the federal government allows politicians to disclose their finances in broad ranges of dollar amounts.

The Republican Party is running a 30-second ad Tuesday on CNN during a broadcast town hall with Hillary Clinton. The ad focuses on her wealth.

CIA Backed Ukrainian Separtists Light the Match that Putin will Use to Destroy the U.S.

Listen closely friends and know that this is all a planned crisis.  The Ukraine issues bring Putin into the position of power over a weakened United States.  China and Russia together will look like the adults in the diplomacy world while the American politicians and corporate oligarchs continue to be portrayed as the lying and stealing thieves they are.  Of course the Russians and Chinese are lying thieves as well, but this part of the drama is to bring America to her knees before the world.  America is in her last days as the world super power, and China / Russia are rising to take control to bring about the one world united peoples Republic headed by the United Nations that I imagine will move to Switzerland the country of neutrality.  Much power rests in the country that controls the worlds fuel supply and sets the value of money.  Get ready for a massive crisis in America and watch the stock market crash.  It’s all going to happen in a short period of time, and while the people are busy reacting to the crisis, going nuts over the loss of basic needs, then the power brokers will bring about a change you would never expect and yet the majority will agree to in order to have peace and “security” once again.  Don’t say you were not warned.

What is the match that has been lit?  Why the economic match of gas / fuel.  They say it could be an accident, but if you believe that, then I have some ocean front property to sell you in Nevada!

Largest Gas Pipeline Serving Europe Through Ukraine Blows Up


From Infowars.com

The Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod or “Brotherhood” natural gas pipeline in the Poltava region of central Ukraine has gone up in flames.

It is the largest consumer gas pipeline in Europe supplying gas to the Czech Republic, Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Hungary and countries in the Balkans. The pipeline stretches 2,800 miles from Siberia’s Urengoy gas field through Ukraine to Europe.

According to witnesses flames from the ruptured pipeline reached 200 meters high.

“The explosion occurred at about 14:45 local time in a field. Due to the flame and the high temperatures, it is impossible to get closer to the epicenter,” a local police press service statement reported.

It was not clear if the explosion was an accident or deliberate. The incident follows on the heels of the Russian energy company Gazprom cutting off gas supplies on Monday after Ukraine missed paying an installment of nearly $2 billion for past deliveries.

“Gazprom supplies to Ukraine only the amount that has been paid for, and the amount that has been paid for is zero,” said Gazprom spokesman, Sergei Kupriyanov, according to The New York Times.

The pipeline, constructed during the Soviet era, was considered a threat to the hegemony of Western oil interests. Its construction was strongly opposed by the Reagan administration and the government prevented U.S. companies from selling supplies to the Soviets. The United States said opposition to the pipeline was in retaliation for Soviet policies toward Poland.

In May a stretch of the pipeline located in the Rozhnyatovskogo district of Ivano-Frankivsk region was damaged. Experts reportedly found evidence of remotely controlled explosives at the site. The Ivano-Frankivsk Prosecutor’s office determined the incident was a “terrorist attack” following a criminal investigation.  Source

“Minerva Research Initiative” – The Pentagon’s Preparation For “Mass Civil Breakdown”

This is why I visit other news sites, even if I don’t like the main voice of the site very much.  I do believe Alex Jones is part of the controlled opposition, but sometimes, a really important bit of information comes out on Infowars.com as they pull from other sites.  This is one such story, and helps to explain the massive increase in government surveillance, increase in DHS buying of ammo and tanks for use in America, and the beefing up of guards and training for detention camps here in America.  This story originated at Zerohedge.  Here is the article:

Meet The "Minerva Research Initiative" - The Pentagon's Preparation For "Mass Civil Breakdown"

Meet The “Minerva Research Initiative” – The Pentagon’s Preparation For “Mass Civil Breakdown”

Tyler Durden's picture

It is simply a matter of time before drones arrest any and all potentially threatening social network “nodes” of future terrorist behavior

About a month ago we showed photos of the Chinese police engaged in a drill designed to crush a “working class insurrection”, in which the police did precisely what would be required to end a middle class rebellion. It made us wonder: what does China know that the US doesn’t. As it turns out, nothing.

Because long before China was practicing counter-riot ops using rubber bullets, all the way back in 2008 the US Department of Defense was conducting studies on the dynamics of civil unrest, and how the US military might best respond. The name of the project: “Minerva Research Initiative” and its role is to ” “improve DoD’s basic understanding of the social, cultural, behavioral and political forces that shape regions of the world of strategic importance to the U.S.

The Guardian which first revealed the details, reports that, “The multi-million dollar programme is designed to develop immediate and long-term “warfighter-relevant insights” for senior officials and decision makers in “the defense policy community,” and to inform policy implemented by “combatant commands.”

The premise behind Minerva is simple: study how violent political overthrow, aka mass civil breakdown, happens in the day and age of social networks, and be prepared to counteract it – by “targeting peaceful activities and protest movements” – when it finally reaches US shores.

Among the projects awarded for the period 2014-2017 is a Cornell University-led study managed by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research which aims to develop an empirical model “of the dynamics of social movement mobilisation and contagions.” The project will determine “the critical mass (tipping point)” of social contagians by studying their “digital traces” in the cases of “the 2011 Egyptian revolution, the 2011 Russian Duma elections, the 2012 Nigerian fuel subsidy crisis and the 2013 Gazi park protests in Turkey.”


Twitter posts and conversations will be examined “to identify individuals mobilised in a social contagion and when they become mobilised.”


Another project awarded this year to the University of Washington “seeks to uncover the conditions under which political movements aimed at large-scale political and economic change originate,” along with their “characteristics and consequences.” The project, managed by the US Army Research Office, focuses on “large-scale movements involving more than 1,000 participants in enduring activity,” and will cover 58 countries in total.

Minerva is well funded: From the outset, the Minerva programme was slated to provide over $75 million over five years for social and behavioural science research. This year alone it has been allocated a total budget of $17.8 million by US Congress.

Among the purely “theoretical” recent studies Minerva is funding is a University of Maryland project in collaboration with the US Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to gauge the risk of civil unrest due to climate change. The three-year $1.9 million project is developing models to anticipate what could happen to societies under a range of potential climate change scenarios.

But what is most disturbing is that since the pretext for Minerva is simply to conduct theoretical social science experiments, there should be zero practical uses of the knowledge gleaned. Well, no.

Although Office of Naval Research supervisor Dr Harold Hawkins had assured the university researchers at the outset that the project was merely “a basic research effort, so we shouldn’t be concerned about doing applied stuff”, the meeting in fact showed that DoD is looking to “feed results” into “applications,” Corman said in the email. He advised his researchers to “think about shaping results, reports, etc., so they [DoD] can clearly see their application for tools that can be taken to the field.”


Many independent scholars are critical of what they see as the US government’s efforts to militarise social science in the service of war. In May 2008, the American Anthropological Association (AAA) wrote to the US government noting that the Pentagon lacks “the kind of infrastructure for evaluating anthropological [and other social science] research” in a way that involves “rigorous, balanced and objective peer review”, calling for such research to be managed instead by civilian agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF).

And tying it all together, is – who else – the NSA.

One war-game, said Price, involved environmental activists protesting pollution from a coal-fired plant near Missouri, some of whom were members of the well-known environmental NGO Sierra Club. Participants were tasked to “identify those who were ‘problem-solvers’ and those who were ‘problem-causers,’ and the rest of the population whom would be the target of the information operations to move their Center of Gravity toward that set of viewpoints and values which was the ‘desired end-state’ of the military’s strategy.”


Such war-games are consistent with a raft of Pentagon planning documents which suggest that National Security Agency (NSA) mass surveillance is partially motivated to prepare for the destabilising impact of coming environmental, energy and economic shocks.

As the Guardian’s Nafeez Ahmed concludes, “Minerva is a prime example of the deeply narrow-minded and self-defeating nature of military ideology. Worse still, the unwillingness of DoD officials to answer the most basic questions is symptomatic of a simple fact – in their unswerving mission to defend an increasingly unpopular global system serving the interests of a tiny minority, security agencies have no qualms about painting the rest of us as potential terrorists.”

We wonder: why is that surprising – by the time the “mass civil breakdown” is set to take place (and grand central-planning experiments by the Fed and its peers will merely accelerate said T-zero Day), virtually everyone who poses even the tiniest threat to the collapsing regime will be branded a terrorist.

Since as we reported previously, yet another current version of what previously was merely science fiction, namely the arrival of pre-crime, or where a big data NSA “pre-cog” computer will determine who is a future terrorist threat merely based on behavioral signals, is just around the corner too, it is simply a matter of time before men in gray suits or better yet – drones – quietly arrest any and all potentially threatening social network “nodes” of future terrorist behavior on the simple grounds that their mere presence threatens the status quo with an even faster collapse.

And now, just ignore all of the above, and keep buying stocks, because all is well: these most certainly aren’t the droids you are looking for.


Sen. Lindsey Graham says a new 9/11 is ‘inevitable’

With my last post being about the dirty bomb material stolen in Mexico and now Sen. Graham talking about a new 9/11, I think we are being primed for the mother of all false flag attacks!  Get ready for some real fireworks near the 4th of July!  Nothing happens by accident on the world stage and these stories are coming out to prep us for WWIII in the Middle East.  What would drive American’s to be willing to turn Iran, Iraq, Syria into a glass parking lot?  Might a limited nuclear attack on America by the Muslim Brotherhood do the trick?  Buckle up and keep your arms and hands inside the ride, it’s about to get very bumpy!

Sen. Graham said decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq has made chances for another 9/11-like attack on American soil “inevitable”

Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday that the decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq has made the chances for another 9/11-like attack on American soil “inevitable.”

“The decision to withdraw U.S. forces created a vacuum,” the South Carolina Republican said on CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” Mediaite reported.

“Syria is launching pad,” he said. “If the central government in Iraq collapses — and that’s the goal of ISIS — Iran will own the southern part of Iraq, that’s where the Shiites live; they can operate ISIS from Baghdad to Kurdistan all the way in to Syria. They will eventually march on Jordan and Lebanon — our best ally in the region is the King of Jordan — and they will attack us from that part of Iraq and Syria. According to our own Director of National Intelligence, FBI Director, the next 9/11 is coming from here.”

“That’s a very serious statement,” host Bob Schieffer remarked.

Full article here



Dirty Bomb Material Stolen in Mexico!

This is a huge story everyone!  With the flood of illegals coming across the border into Texas and Arizona we have to wonder if this bomb is coming here to America to a city to create the greatest mayhem.  This video speaks of the details.  You are not hearing about this on MSM:


This is over five days old!    What if this goes off at Hoover dam?  What if it takes out a major power grid?  WAKE-UP!

Michael Hastings Died After His Report on Bowe Burgdahl

(Don’t miss the video at the bottom of the article)


I well remember the strange death of Michael Hastings who died this past year.  He was reportedly afraid for his life and had told some people close to him that he was on a big story.  He had done an expose on Bowe Burgdahl, and then had this very strange accident.  I am amazed at the fact that our government has not quite figured out yet, that what they used to get away with twenty years ago in their little psy op campaigns is not going to work anymore.  We have massive citizen journalists who have taken up the role of reporting because the government / corporate owned media is not longer willing to be the watch dog they were meant to be.

Not everyone forgets news that is a year or two old.  Some people will report on events and dig them up when the other piece to the puzzle falls into place!  The death of Michael Hastings seemed staged when it happened, but now it seems a sure thing that he was shut up permanently and it was all in regards to this prisoner swap of Burgdahl.

Western Jouralism website has a full story on this and a video which you need to watch.  I could not find it on youtube or I would have posted it.  Go here, to watch the video.  I did find another video about Hastings and the Burgdahl information on youtube that is pretty well done:


The article this video was taken from:

Why Was the FBI Investigating Michael Hastings’ Reporting on Bowe Bergdahl?


By Alice Speri

June 3, 2014 |

Three years into the disappearance of Bowe Bergdahl in Afghanistan, Michael Hastings — the journalist whose reporting cost General Stanley McChrystal his job — wrote a Rolling Stone story on the missing soldier, a piece which the magazine called “the definitive first account of Bowe Bergdahl.”

Hastings, who died in a car accident in Los Angeles in June 2013, had unparalleled access for that story.

He spoke to Bergdahl’s parents, who had by that time stopped talking to the press, following “subtle pressure” from the army, and he quoted from emails the young soldier had sent to them, documenting his growing disillusion with the war and the US military.

Hastings also spoke to several unnamed men in Bergdahl’s unit — soldiers who, we now know, had to sign a strict nondisclosure agreement forbidding them from discussing the soldier’s disappearance and search with anyone — let alone one of the top investigative journalists in the country.

‘Michael and Matt both worked really, really hard on that story, and I know for a fact that they did it in a way that completely angered the US military and the US government.’

But most controversially, Hastings’ piece revealed what has been the subject of much debate and vitriol over the last few days: That a disillusioned Bergdahl had actually abandoned his post and “walked away.”

At the time of the story’s publication, the media had all but forgotten about Bergdahl — who was released on Saturday after five years in the hands of the Taliban, in exchange for five Guantanamo prisoners. And, with the exception of some initial chatter, Hastings’ piece, which paints a deeply unflattering picture of Bergdahl’s unit and its leadership, hardly had the impact of some of his other investigations.

But someone did pay attention to it: the FBI.

That, at least, is what was revealed in a heavily redacted document released by the agency following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request — filed on the day of Hastings’ death — by investigative journalist Jason Leopold and Ryan Shapiro, an MIT doctoral student whom the Justice Department once called the “most prolific” requester of FOIA documents.

The document, partially un-redacted after Leopold and Shapiro engaged in a lengthy legal battle with the FBI for failing to fulfill its FOIA obligations, singles out Hastings’ Rolling Stone piece — “America’s Last Prisoner of War” — as “controversial reporting.” It names Hastings and Matthew Farwell, a former soldier in Afghanistan and a contributing reporter to Hastings’ piece.

‘If this deployment is lame, I’m just going to walk off into the mountains of Pakistan.’

The document also included an Associated Press report based on the Rolling Stone piece, and what it identifies as a “blog entry” penned by Gary Farwell, Matthew’s father — which actually appears to be a comment entry on the Idaho Statesman’s website.

“The article reveals private email excerpts, from [redacted] to his parents. The excerpts include quotes about being ‘ashamed to even be American,’ and threats that, ‘If this deployment is lame, I’m just going to walk off into the mountains of Pakistan,’” the FBI file reads. “The Rolling Stone article ignited a media frenzy, speculating about the circumstances of [redacted] capture, and whether US resources and effort should continue to be expended for his recovery.”

‘I’m happy the FBI is reading Rolling Stone on the job.’

The FBI file — as well as a Department of Justice document released in response to Leopold and Shapiro’s lawsuit — suggests that Hastings and Farwell’s reporting got swept up into an “international terrorist investigation” into Bergdahl’s disappearance.

A spokesperson for the FBI told VICE News that the agency does not normally comment on pending investigations and that it lets FOIA documents “speak for themselves.” The investigation was still pending as of last month, Leopold said.

According to the files — and a rare public statement by the FBI following Hastings’ death — Hastings was never directly under investigation by the agency, despite having pissed off a lot of people in very high places.  MORE




The Western Journalism Piece states:

This Journalist Died After Exposing Bowe Bergdahl’s Anti-Americanism

At the time Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings was killed under suspicious circumstances, he had recently written a huge exposé on Bowe Bergdahl, revealing that he had deserted his unit and actively sought out the Taliban. Hastings had also revealed Bergdahl’s anti-American sentiments, publishing the emails to his father that so shocked America: “I am ashamed to be an American…The horror that is America is disgusting.”

This revelation actually came in July of 2012, when Hastings published a ten-thousand word article on Bergdahl, in which he had traveled to Afghanistan to speak to his former platoon mates, the soldiers violating their gag order to speak to Hastings anonymously. Hastings had also visited Bergdahl’s parents in Idaho, where he presumably obtained the emails. When we saw Obama pawing Bowe Bergdahl’s mother and hugging his father last week in the White House Rose Garden, this wasn’t how he was treating them in 2012. The Obama administration in 2012 had “encouraged” his parents to keep their mouths shut. The father, Robert Bergdahl, had gone on a very public crusade, criticizing the Obama administration for killing Afghanistan civilians, and had even said that one of the Taliban captors of his son had had his child murdered by a CIA drone—mirroring events in the popular Showtime series “Homeland”. This was stated at a very public GOP fundraising event in 2010 hosted by former RNC head Michael Steele. Robert Bergdahl had also just posted a video on YouTube, where he appealed directly to this son’s captors, stating: “…We must also thank those who have cared for our son for almost two years…We have wept that God may show his beneficence, his mercy and that his peace may come upon the people of Pakistan. As-salamu alaykum [peace be upon you].”

After this, the Obama administration actively sought to keep the lid on Robert Bergdahl and Michael Hastings’ reporting of Bowe Bergdahl, as secret FBI documents now reveal.

A 22-page secret FBI report dated June 11, 2012, obtained by investigative reporter Jason Leopold, shows that both Hastings and former Afghanistan war veteran and co-writer Matt Farwell were under an intense FBI investigation in early 2012. The document is highly redacted; but it appears Hastings and Farwell were under direct FBI surveillance, including when they met with Bowe Bergdahl’s parents in 2012.

Keep in mind, at the time of Hastings’ death, the FBI had denied they had ever investigated Hastings, despite Hastings sending out a frantic email hours before his death with the subject line: “FBI Investigation,” stating that he was being investigated. Also included in the body of the email was a reference to a “big story” he was working on. This “big story” turned out not to be about Bergdahl, but an investigation of then-terrorism czar—now CIA head—John Brennan, per Hastings’ widow. After Hastings’ death, all of his notes and documents on Brennan were suppressed—and this “big story” never appeared in Rolling Stone.

The Obama administration had also been successful at suppressing the fact that Bowe Bergdahl was essentially a traitor and that his father was not far behind. Bowe Bergdahl’s father, Robert Bergdahl, has been tweeting out a stream of anti-American propaganda for months. Three days before his son was released,Robert Bergdahl called for all Guantanamo Bay prisoners to be released, not just the five Taliban generals Obama ended up trading for a traitor. When social media grabbed the tail of the Bergdahl beast last week—exposing the Bergdahl father and son treachery—the Bowe Bergdahl beast could not be stopped by the Obama spin machine.”    MORE


Now, I will ask you, do you think anything that happens out of the ordinary that involves politicians is by accident?  The people are getting wise to the game being played, and the players know this.  Look for events to speed up very soon to keep us off balance, reacting instead of responding, and going into a crisis mode which the players believe they can monitor, control, and use to bring about total world power and domination of every man, woman, and child on earth.

Was Hastings Assassinated? Was it a number of issues and not just Burgdahl?  This video brings a lot of points up, and you will hear from Michael Hastings as to his viewpoints and findings:


Russia Warns of Possible Catastrophic Event at Yellowstone (ALERT)

This is troubling to hear about.  Russia seems to be willing to give us a warning that our media will not report.  This is a red alert to be prepared for a possible catastrophic event.  Could this be why FEMA has been active in Region 4 and agencies have been ramping up emergency supplies and ammo in case of societal breakdown of this proportion?  Do you have food and water to get your family through an emergency lasting a week, a month or six months?  What happens if the power goes out across half of America due to a disaster?  We were warned of  many troubles, and only the foolish do not prepare for natural disasters.  Watch the video and read the article:



Russia Issues Grim Report On North American Magnetic Anomaly


A grim report prepared by Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force Lieutenant-General Viktor Bondarev on the just completed scientific mission of North America carried out by 4 Tupolev Tu-95 strategic aircraft and 2 Ilyushin Il-78 aerial refueling tankers that “electronically swept” for “magnetic anomalies” from Alaska to California warns that a “catastrophic event” may be nearing for this region.

US officials, it should be noted, characterized this purely scientific mission as a “bombing run” that came within 50 miles of California, but which their Air Forces were able to repel by their launching of F-15 fighter jets.

This report, however, states that this scientific mission was necessitated by a “severe mysterious magnetic anomaly” detected by the Kosmos 2473 satellite on 3 June occurring in the Yellowstone region of the Western United States which resulted in what is called an “earthquake swarm.”

Most important to note about the 3 June Yellowstone “magnetic anomaly”, this report continues, are that satellite measurements show it being precipitated by the mysterious earthquake swarm hitting the Brooks Range mountains in Alaska, and which seismologists are still at a loss to explain.

The information relating to the linking of these two “events”, this report says, was further verified by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) magnetic anomaly maps and data for North America showing a strange magnetic “disturbance/ripple” emanating from Brooks Range and ending at Yellowstone on 3 June, both of these areas, it is important to note, being part of the Rocky Mountains that stretch more than 4,830 km (3,000 miles) from the northernmost part of British Columbia, in western Canada, to New Mexico, in the southwestern United States.

Of grave concern to Russian military authorities relating to these “events”, General Bondarev says in his report, was the “catastrophic effect” they had on the advanced “magnetoceptioninertial navigation systems employed by many US-NATO-Russian warplanes which use these highly sophisticated aircraft flight devices.

Though no Russia military aircraft were near the “disturbed magnetic zone” emanating our from Yellowstone on 3 June, this report says, two US military aircraft were at its “boundaries” in the Southern California region on 4 June while this “event” was still “active” causing them both to crash.

The two US fighter jets crashing on 4 June, this report continues, were identified as a US Navy F-A-183 that went down when the pilot was attempting to land aboard the carrier Carl Vinson, and a US Marine Harrier AV-8B jet that crashed into a residential community in Imperial, about 90 miles east of San Diego, both of them occurring within hours of each other.

This report notes that no civilian aircraft would have been affected by this “magnetic anomaly” as only the most advanced military aircraft employ these “geomagnetic-satellite” coordinated flight systems which enable them to “hug the terrain” not unlike the magnetic systems used by birds and insects to navigate.


Russian concerns relating to “magnetic anomalies”, it is important to note, are related to the rapidly shifting north magnetic pole which since 2005 has been moving at a rate of 40 kilometers (25 miles) a year from Arctic Canada toward Siberia.

Frightening independent research from last year (2013) further warns that this shift is still picking up speed and according to this researcher should reach Siberia in at least within 2 years. [See video HERE (banned in US)]

One of the effects of the rapidly shifting magnetic north pole being noticed the most, this report notes, are the airport runway systems being disrupted because of it, and as we can read one such 2011 example which occurred in the US:

“Tampa International Airport was forced to readjust its runways Thursday to account for the movement of the Earth’s magnetic fields, information that pilots rely upon to navigate planes. Thanks to the fluctuations in the force, the airport has closed its primary runway until Jan. 13 to change taxiway signs to account for the shift, the Federal Aviation Administration said.


The poles are generated by movements within the Earth’s inner and outer cores, though the exact process isn’t exactly understood. They’re also constantly in flux, moving a few degrees every year, but the changes are almost never of such a magnitude that runways require adjusting, said Paul Takemoto, a spokesman for the FAA.”

The most chilling aspects of General Bondarev’s report relating to these “events” are the equations he uses in postulating that what is now occurring in North America with these “mysterious magnetic anomalies” occurring over a large expanse of the Rocky Mountains, and when combined with the rapidly shifting magnetic north pole and growing evidence of global climate change, give “huge credibility” to what is called “The Expanding Earth Theory”.

The expanding Earth or growing Earth hypothesis asserts that the position and relative movement of continents is at least partially due to the volume of Earth increasing and stands in contrast to that of plate tectonics, but which new findings relating to “aether theories” and dark matter, General Bondarev summarizes, means “grave consideration” must be given to the words of University of California, Davis, cosmologist Dr. Andreas Albrecht who warned: “We’ve hit some really profound problems with cosmology Ð with dark matter and dark energy, that tells us we have to rethink fundamental physics and try something new.

Or in simple terms, this report ends, “We may be on the verge of a catastrophic North American “event” that could possibly change the world forever, we should be prepared.”


The Agenda has Fallen into Place (Full Documentary)

Don’t ever let someone tell you that you are crazy or nuts for believing in conspiracy.  The facts have been found out.  The truth is out already, but most are either lazy, scared, distracted or afraid of being labeled a conspiracy nut.  This is a great way to keep people under your control.  Sadly, knowing the truth means you have to do something about it or be a hypocrite.  I don’t mean you have to rise up and fight literally with arms, guns, or other means. I mean, this is a spiritual battle, and being willing to tell the truth is your greatest power.

Tell your children and friends.  Don’t let them be brainwashed.

The Truth about our Schooling and True History

I just watched this short 8 minute video, and am now listening to the podcast it came from.  It’s very eye opening to say the least.  The podcast link is posted below:





For an expansion of the ideas in this video, check out these episodes of the podcast:
School Sucks #134: The American Way Expanded (1 of 3): The Gasoline-Soaked House

School Sucks #135: The American Way Expanded (2 of 3): Pyromania

School Sucks #136: The American Way Expanded (3 of 3): The Matches

To browse all podcasts, visit http://schoolsucks.podomatic.com/